Question:
impeach Bush the Moverment has begun - where do you stand?
anonymous
2007-03-07 13:11:55 UTC
By Jason Szep

ADVERTISEMENT

BOSTON (Reuters) - More than 30 Vermont towns passed resolutions on Tuesday seeking to impeach President Bush, while at least 16 towns in the tiny New England state called on Washington to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq.


Known for picturesque autumn foliage, colonial inns, maple sugar and old-fashion dairy farms, Vermont is in the vanguard of a grass-roots protest movement to impeach Bush over his handling of the unpopular Iraq war.


"We're putting impeachment on the table," said James Leas, a Vermont lawyer who helped to draft the resolutions and is tracking the votes. "The people in all these towns are voting to get this process started and bring the troops home now."
26 answers:
anonymous
2007-03-07 13:26:41 UTC
What's the point, his term is almost up. The cost of doing this wouldn't be worth it. Do you want Cheney for President, that is what would happen.
Blessed Rain
2007-03-07 22:24:49 UTC
I don't think he should be impeached let go back to the beginning shall we?

we have several planes taken over and used as weapons of mass destruction, the amount of people that died is nauseating, lets think for a moment that we had not entered the war in which we are in and there had been several more attacks on the country we would be calling again for impeachment for failure to act, for failure to protect America. Really I think he was screwed from the beginning there is no peace to be made with a country of terrorists and oppressors for they seek peace as a weak and pathetic thing.

No matter what Pres. Bush did he would have been censured on this, I think we should be grateful we have a president who is not afraid to act against popular opinion to defend people who hate him.

If you look at the whole picture there never is a "right" road.
anonymous
2007-03-07 21:20:32 UTC
This is pointless. That's where I stand. The people who think this stuff up are obviously very naive on the subject of impeachment. Just because the president gets impeached does not mean he has to leave office. Clinton got impeached and he never left office. So do yourself a favor and do something useful with your spare time. Try going back to school to further your education. And better yet, get a job. At least you get paid for that.
dapixelator
2007-03-07 21:21:25 UTC
You're kidding right? 30 Vermont towns? What is that like 1000's people?



Don't waste our time or money on impeachment unless there is real evidence of a CRIME. We've got more to worry about.
dbake50
2007-03-07 21:20:23 UTC
Remember, Bush didn't go to war in Iraq without the support of congress. If he is impeachable, so is Hillary, along with a whole lot of other liberals who voted for the war. It's interesting that congress can't even agree on how to disagree with Bush. They have no answers, only complaints.
?
2007-03-07 21:17:22 UTC
Just because people have changed their minds about what they elected George W Bush to do as president, doesn't justify impeachment hearings. There is absolutely no evidence on any wrong-doing by president Bush, otherwise leading democrats would be all over him. Yes they complain about him and regret THEIR support of his initiatives regarding Iraq and military spending, but that's not grounds for impeachment. And those that insist on impeachment are wasting their time. Bush is in the 3rd year of his LAST term in office. You're better off finding and supporting your candidate of choice for 2008 since Bush can't run for office again!!!
sgt3884
2007-03-07 21:40:20 UTC
I would assume from your question that "they" want to

impeach MY President due to a war that is basically'

protecting OUR freedom to express ourselves as we

are now doing. Most people are concerned about

the supposedly non-existent Weapons of Mass Destruction. I personally believe the Weapons of Mass

Destruction did, in fact, exist. Consider the time frame

at the beginning of the war. It did not start suddenly...

Due to President Bush's desire to please "everyone"

he delayed while he appealed to the UN and went

throughout the world to raise a coalition. Meanwhile....

the (thank God) Late Saddam Hussein moved the

WMDs the adjoining sympathetic states. Hussein was

a murdering tyrant but he wasn't totally stupid. Why

did the Hussein Regime block UNSCUM from weapons

inspections during the Clinton Years? Why did President

Clinton Bomb Iraq for these problems during his Administration? Is it not obvious to anyone with a brain

that this a justified war against an evil regime and now

against people who want to kill AMERICANS. Wake Up..

read about "Radical" Islamists who want to kill you..Why

impeach someone who wants to protect you?
anonymous
2007-03-07 21:25:43 UTC
You do realize that the decision to do anything was not just by the President but by congress as well.



Everyone was given the same information (whether it was right or wrong) and acted upon it.



I find it funny that so many people like to finger point on one man.
anonymous
2007-03-07 21:17:41 UTC
There has to be a crime commited to start impeachment hearings. This is a waste or time. If we had as many Americans in support fo this country as we do against it...think what we could accomplish.

I am a troop, where do I stand. Well, with my boots in the sand. We'll come home when the job is done.
anonymous
2007-03-07 21:25:14 UTC
I think you kind of have to have a reason to impeach someone, and if you give the reason of "he lied to us" then you had better talk to Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, etc, etc, etc about what they thought when they voted to go to war! Actually, Hillary said that she thought it was her moral conviction! So come on, don't be ridiculous! The real question is how do we deal with terrorism? Thinking creatively is the solution, not trying to point the finger, because there are plenty of places to point!
anonymous
2007-03-07 21:17:40 UTC
You can't impeach a president because you don't agree with his policies. This measure will go nowhere. Besides, if Bush is forced from office, this will be no guarantee of an immediate withdrawal from Iraq. In fact I would bet against it since then the nation would collapse.
anonymous
2007-03-07 21:53:53 UTC
Why am I not surprised this is from the Socialist Republic of Vermont?
Fast Eddie B
2007-03-07 21:16:33 UTC
Oh, I stand for common sense, most definitely!



Which is why I'll be laughing my @ss off watching this sideshow!



How many of you dingalings realize how far out the part of Vermont taken over by refugees from the Upper West Side really is? I mean, this is the same crowd that brought us Howlin' Howie Dean - remember him? That crowd is best ignored, if only for your own mental health.
Amanda D
2007-03-07 22:24:26 UTC
OK GREAT!!!!!!!! BUT WHEN BIN LADEN COMES BACK OUT OF HIDING IF HE IS NOT DEAD OR IF HIS AL QUEDA MEMBERS COME BACK AND BOMB US WITH PLANES OR TRAINS OR BABIES OR PREGNANT WOMEN OR THE KORAN OR ANYTHING ELSE THEY CAN THINK OF WHO DO WE GET TO BLAME THEN VERMONT? HOW DO WE IMPEACH AN ENTIRE TOWN? ANSWER ME THAT ? I HAVE POINTS DONT TELL ME I DONT ALL YOU LEFT WINGERS OUT THEIR PUT YOUR WET FINGERS IN THE AIR AND TELL ME WHERE THE TERRORIST WIND WILL BOW THEN..
go
2007-03-07 21:14:43 UTC
As long as Cheney goes also. But id much rahter have Bush insteadof Cheney
Kevin A
2007-03-07 23:48:15 UTC
ROFLMAO





Do you think there's even half a chance? It's taken you 6 years and you still have NOTHING.
anonymous
2007-03-07 21:18:25 UTC
the problem is that the movement has not moved anywhere near Washington.
slabsidebass
2007-03-07 21:26:57 UTC
more like another BOWEL MOVEMENT from the oh-so-righteous liberal left.

I stand with President Bush!
anonymous
2007-03-07 21:19:30 UTC
Im too busy to worry about protesting and such. You guys have fun, while I am working, volunteering, house hunting, etc.
Trollbuster
2007-03-07 22:28:49 UTC
That "movement" is more of the bowel variety.
anonymous
2007-03-07 21:18:11 UTC
Wealthy republican here, I support President Bush.
anonymous
2007-03-07 21:14:56 UTC
I will stand in the way of it, just as the lack of evidence will also block any movement.
Frann
2007-03-07 21:20:14 UTC
They are not the first to think of this. I believe it will happen even if it is only ceremonial.
anonymous
2007-03-07 21:15:41 UTC
He not only needs to be impeached he needs to be tried for the crimes he has commited against the Iraqi people, and the crimes against humanity. He should be held to the same standard as Saddam, he is just as evil.
anonymous
2007-03-07 23:01:57 UTC
It won't happen.
webbrew
2007-03-07 21:15:13 UTC
it will go nowhere. there have been no impeachable offenses.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...