Question:
The Nay-sayers 9/11 information requests for proof?
darrellkern
2007-04-14 10:55:35 UTC
http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/fomer_bush_speechwriter_hints_at_911_inside_job.htm

One of the constant rebuttals from 9/11 debunkers has been where's the inside whistle blowers as they surely would have surfaced by now.

They have been out there all along. Click the link above and hear it directly from a man who had Bush's and Cheney's ear.

I expect to hear all the "give it a rest" and standard name calling and thumbs down crap.

Game over! You guys are done!
Thirteen answers:
anonymous
2007-04-14 11:36:38 UTC
That's why Clinton didn't take out Bin Ladin when he had the chance, several chances. We have satellite surveillance that can see a hair on a flees butt, but we couldn't find a dying Arab in the hills Afghanistan. If you've got the stones, click on 911 mysteries, and watch the movie. Shocking, simply shocking. The truth will come out. I not a liberal. I'm a Conservative republican.Ronald Reagen at that. The whistle blowers are about to let it rip. And there are many.
anonymous
2007-04-14 11:48:48 UTC
There is not a single 9/11 conspiracy theory that I find remotely plausible.

* The gov't shot down United 93. – That claim has been debunked so many times that repeating it only soils the memory of the heroes of the flight.

* The gov't was behind the attacks. – There are so many things wrong with this I don't know where to start.

1. What possible reason would the US gov't have to kill 3000 of its own?

2. Bush is nowhere near smart enough to arrange it.

3. The planning of the 9/11 attacks began in 1998. Who was running the gov’t in 1998?

4. It would require so many agencies of the gov't working together that that alone makes it impossible, much less keeping it secret.

5. If 9/11 was an inside job, and the gov’t would have no qualms killing 3000 of its own to start a war, it wouldn’t hesitate to kill the conspiracy theorists.

6. Doesn't the fact that Osama admitted to it mean anything to anyone?

* The FDNY was ordered to implode the building. – Okay, the FDNY lost 343 good men and women because they were busy planting explosives with such perfect precision that the building imploded straight down. Does that make sense to anyone?

* The Zionists/Mossad/Israel was behind the attacks. 4000 Jews stayed home from work. – First, this was started by Hezbollah, which, before 9/11, led all terrorist orgs in number of Americans killed. Second, many Jews were among the dead and injured. I guess they missed the email. Third, many Christians and Muslims and others took the day off or were late. Did they get the email instead of the Jews? Or was it that 9/11/01 was primary day in New York State and some people of all religious backgrounds needed to work on campaigns that day?

* Mossad knew about the attacks beforehand. – This is true. Mossad, MI6, the CIA and FBI, and other intelligence agencies worldwide all knew something was going to happen. Unfortunately, no one knew what, when, how, where, or by whom.
?
2016-10-22 08:01:07 UTC
That argument purely works if somebody assumes that theism is inherently extra achieveable than atheism. besides the undeniable fact that in case you have been to ask that guy or woman to justify that assumption, my wager is they might grow to be very quiet. while it comes ideal right down to it, all people is a naysayer on the difficulty of religion. whatever a guy or woman believes, just about each and all of the international disagrees with them. one extra ingredient. i hit upon it exciting that such assorted Christians are dismissive of alternative Christians, claiming that they are actually not 'Christian' adequate. They brush off not purely different Christian denominations yet different theistic religions to boot, including Islam. besides the undeniable fact that while those Christians debate an atheist, they unavoidably throw interior the argument "how are you able to be an atheist while assorted the international believes in God?". swiftly each and all of the worlds theists are contributors of an identical club. It would not make plenty experience.
Brian O
2007-04-14 11:21:39 UTC
There is a book out that debunks all the 9/11 myths. I am sure if you search on Amazon you will find it. Many of the myths that were put out were done using quotes that were played with. Such as the one how a missle hit the Pentagon. When they actually found the individual the quote was attributed to, they found he stated that the plane hit the Pentagon, like a missle. Many of the scientic arguments to prove it was a conspiracy were found to be using faulty science as a basis. Using fomulas to prove things they were not actually designed to prove, and then some of them were incomplete to give answers that were not accurate at all.
anonymous
2007-04-14 11:14:37 UTC
Maybe you should read the article again. He said he blames Al Quaida for 9/11. He makes assumptions about the religious right planning something to justify going to war. He didn't say the Bush admin did 9/11. Can't you read?

You are guilty of misinterpreting his article, just as he probably is guilty of misinterpreting what the religious right was planning. If the plans had been in discussion for years, as he claimed, then why should we assume that the plans were formulated after this administration took office, or during the administration of Bush one. The plans could have been formulated during the Clinton admin.

The conspiracy folks still don't have proof. Until proof is forthcoming, then us common sense people will believe that it was a terrorist plot, planned and executed by, TERRORISTS!!!!
wizjp
2007-04-14 11:01:54 UTC
more standard conspiracy theory crap. Reality and the facts make this funny at best.



The obvious question of course is why go to Afganistan if this was all about Iraq?



Sorry; the game is over; and there is no credible evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.



Give it a rest.
anonymous
2007-04-14 11:27:54 UTC
Ummmmmm. I went to your web site, where is your proof ? You have just reinforced all debunked conspiracies.
Geo Washington
2007-04-14 11:01:19 UTC
the rebuttal is that it is improbable not anything else, everything else is just picking awya at your pathetic belief.



Dude, i went to your fanatical website and you have no proof only one mans opinion. Check out Popular Mechanics debunking 911 and look at the credits at the end of the argument.



oh yeah, your're an idiot
anonymous
2007-04-14 11:08:07 UTC
we have to be clear and there is too much to explain. I agree with you. Bush's group did not cause the attacks but siezed it to promote plans that were already in action. You cannot pull disbelievers through the rabbit hole they have to see it for themselves. At most we can point them in the right direction, but not to articles, we must send them to the source, and that is different for each of us. It does sound so freakin crazy.
Kevin A
2007-04-14 11:04:04 UTC
Infowars?



ROFLAMO



You've got to be kidding. You're putting trust in an Arab propaganda site?





ROFLMAO!
Peter Pumpkin Eater
2007-04-14 11:10:04 UTC
Good job. It's good to see there are some that are willing to take the name calling abuse to post facts.
anonymous
2007-04-14 11:12:26 UTC
The best you can come up with is Victor Gold who claims that Bush was ready to go after Iraq when he got into office.



You are right the game is over for you time to breath in realtiy.



The intent for Iraq is a long long way from getting thousands and upon thousands of people organized to pull off 911 as infowar claims.

After 6 plus years and countless studies base in reality. When there hasn't been 1 single physical piece of evidence to backup consparcy that Bush did 911 when taken in context and independently verfied.



With all the hate media against Bush.

CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, NY Times, etc.

won't bring this story out. If they did Bush would have been gone before the smoke cleared in NY.





When you have real proof and I do mean REAL.

I will be the first in line to apologize and go to Washington myself to call for Bush to be gone.



Tell than get a tin hat and take you meds it is about time.



I am also looking forward to the day I don't have to keep posting this and I will once the consparcy nuts stop posting their junk:

In order for the 9/11 conspiracies to work the following must happen without any problems. If anything were to go slightly wrong it would have failed.



1. The entire military change of command that would be necessary to fire a missile would have to keep absolutely silent. That would include the pilots, ground crews, and those who are held accountable for the missiles.

2. There were have to be a record time explosives experts rigging the WTC without the chief of security of the WTC (He was nations best expert on terrorism) not noticing them working in the WTC.

3. The list of eyewitnesses who saw the plane crash into the Pentagon all had to be briefed and all their stories had to be prefect.

a. Partial list: http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blflight77w.htm

b. Another view: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0203/S00134.htm

4. Also you have to everyone part of executing the plan to remain absolutely silent and not leaks.

a. Other problems explain better than I: http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blflight77.htm

5. For those want to bring up the reason why the hijackers are not listed on the manifest please read. http://www.marsearthconnection.com/manifests.html

6. Please remember the claims how dumb Bush is and Washington is town that can’t keep one affair secret.

7. Let us not forget all the recorded (YES) recorded phone calls between the passengers and people on the ground. How they relay the information so that the hijackers were id so quickly.

8. Jews didn’t show up to work fiction:

a. http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/w/wtcisraelis.htm

9. For the WTC 7 question I direct you to: http://wtc.nist.gov/progress_report_june04/appendixl.pdf

10. For the myth about explosive material found at the WTC. Lets consider the following:

Fluorite

http://www.minerals.net/mineral/halides/fluorite/fluorite.htm

commonly occurs in limestone formations



Some uses of for

http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/fluorspar/



http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/fluorspar/index.html#mis



http://www.sydneysteelmuseum.com/history/art_of_steelmaking.htm

Limestone can have small amounts of fluorite in it



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorite



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steel

(some quality control issues given)



http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/



http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/Products/Pglossary/mineral.html

hardness scale



11. Why the building feel the way it did: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/07/04/eveningnews/main627441.shtml

a. I am using CBS for a reason so you don’t ***** if I used Fox.

b. Don’t like CBS how about this right wing rag Scientific America

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&articleID=000DA0E2-1E15-128A-9E1583414B7F0000&colID=13



12. Just found this gem from the explosive experts.

a.

b.



Finally it comes down to this what is the motivation for all the conspiracies?



Is their hate for Bush so great they are willing to trash the memories and heroes of 9/11 in order to make Bush look bad? The answer by all the web sites and who is backing them is a resounding YES!



The good news is there are others who believe you.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/22/world/europe/22cnd-pew.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

btw: They want you dead too.



Need proof of that? http://www.washingtontimes.com/commentary/20060830-085517-9650r.htm





In case you happen to lose your hat here is where you can get more: http://zapatopi.net/afdb/ or if you got taste try this http://www.ericisgreat.com/tinfoilhats/







Screw Loose Change Video. (Yes, it's finally here)

http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr/

Loose Trains

http://loosetrains911.blogspot.com/

Salon - The 9/11 deniers

http://www.salon.com/ent/feature/2006/06/27/911_conspiracies/index.html

SciAm blog about conspiracists' reaction to Shermer

http://sciam-editor.typepad.com/weblog1/2005/05/a_conspiracy_of.html



In These Times: Nightmares of Reason: Sorting fact from fiction in 9/11 conspiracy theories

http://www.inthesetimes.com/issue/26/15/feature1.shtml



The September 11 X-Files

http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames?bid=3&pid=66



Interview with Prof. Jonathan Barnett, an expert in structural and fire protection engineering who was one of the WTC investigators

http://www.wpi.edu/News/Transformations/2002Spring/fall.html



Snopes debunks "Hunt the Boeing", a conspiracy site based on Thierry Meysan’s (and David Ray Griffin’s) claim that a missile, not AA77, hit the Pentagon

http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/pentagon.htm



Wikipedia articles on conspiracy theory characteristics

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theories

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracism

Journal Of Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

http://www.jod911.com

Engineers Explain WTC Collapse

http://www.architectureweek.com/2002/0529/news_3-1.html

Report Ties WTC Collapses to Column Failures

http://enr.construction.com/news/buildings/archives/040119.asp

IT WAS THE FIRE, CAUSED THE TWIN TOWER COLLAPSE - icivilengineer.com

http://www.icivilengineer.com/News/WTC/Fire.html

Simulation for the collapse of WTC after aeroplane impact - Lu XZ., Yang N., Jiang JJ. Structure Engineer, 66(sup.). 2003, 18-22

Bazant, Z.P., & Zhou, Y.

"Addendum to 'Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? - Simple Analysis" (pdf)

Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 3, (2002): 369-370.

Brannigan, F.L.

"WTC: Lightweight Steel and High-Rise Buildings"

Fire Engineering v.155, no. 4, (2002): 145-150.

Clifton, Charles G.

Elaboration on Aspects of the Postulated Collapse of the World Trade Centre Twin Towers

HERA: Innovation in Metals. 2001. 13 December 2001.

"Construction and Collapse Factors"

Fire Engineering v.155, no. 10, (2002): 106-108.

Corbett, G.P.

"Learning and Applying the Lessons of the WTC Disaster"

Fire Engineering v.155, no. 10, (2002.): 133-135.

"Dissecting the Collapses"

Civil Engineering ASCE v. 72, no. 5, (2002): 36-46.

Eagar, T.W., & Musso, C.

"Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation"

JOM v. 53, no. 12, (2001): 8-12.

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Therese McAllister, report editor.

World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Data Collection, Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations

(also available on-line)

Gabrielson, T.B., Poese, M.E., & Atchley, A.A.

"Acoustic and Vibration Background Noise in the Collapsed Structure of the World Trade Center"

The Journal of Acoustical Society of America v. 113, no. 1, (2003): 45-48.

Glover, N.J.

"Collapse Lessons"

Fire Engineering v. 155, no. 10, (2002): 97-103

Marechaux, T.G.

"TMS Hot Topic Symposium Examines WTC Collapse and Building Engineering"

JOM, v. 54, no. 4, (2002): 13-17.

Monahan, B.

"World Trade Center Collapse-Civil Engineering Considerations"

Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction v. 7, no. 3, (2002): 134-135.

Newland, D.E., & Cebon, D.

"Could the World Trade Center Have Been Modified to Prevent Its Collapse?"

Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 7, (2002):795-800.

National Instititue of Stamdards and Technology: Congressional and Legislative Affairs

“Learning from 9/11: Understanding the Collapse of the World Trade Center”

Statement of Dr. Arden L. Bement, Jr., before Committee of Science House of Representatives, United States Congress on March 6, 2002.

Pinsker, Lisa, M.

"Applying Geology at the World Trade Center Site"

Geotimes v. 46, no. 11, (2001).

The print copy has 3-D images.

Public Broadcasting Station (PBS)

Why the Towers Fell: A Companion Website to the Television Documentary.

NOVA (Science Programming On Air and Online)

Post, N.M.

"No Code Changes Recommended in World Trade Center Report"

ENR v. 248, no. 14, (2002): 14.

Post, N.M.

"Study Absolves Twin Tower Trusses, Fireproofing"

ENR v. 249, no. 19, (2002): 12-14.

The University of Sydney, Department of Civil Engineering

World Trade Center - Some Engineering Aspects

A resource site.

"WTC Engineers Credit Design in Saving Thousands of Lives"

ENR v. 247, no. 16, (2001): 12.

The Towers Lost and Beyond

http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Eduardo Kausel, John E. Fernandez, Tomasz Wierzbicki, Liang Xue, Meg Hendry-Brogan, Ahmed F. Ghoniem, Oral Buyukozturk, Franz-Josef Ulm, Yossi Sheffi
Cindy P
2007-04-14 11:09:45 UTC
This is borrowed from a question from this site. People still in denial are fools!



The Coincidence Theorists Guide to 9/11



That governments have permitted terrorist acts against their own people, and have even themselves been perpetrators in order to find strategic advantage is quite likely true, but this is the United States we're talking about.



That intelligence agencies, financiers, terrorists and narco-criminals have a long history together is well established, but the Nugan Hand Bank, BCCI, Banco Ambrosiano, the P2 Lodge, the CIA/Mafia anti-Castro/Kennedy alliance, Iran/Contra and the rest were a long time ago, so there's no need to rehash all that. That was then, this is now!



That Jonathan Bush's Riggs Bank has been found guilty of laundering terrorist funds and fined a US-record $25 million must embarrass his nephew George, but it's still no justification for leaping to paranoid conclusions.



That George Bush's brother Marvin sat on the board of the Kuwaiti-owned company which provided electronic security to the World Trade Centre, Dulles Airport and United Airlines means nothing more than you must admit those Bush boys have done alright for themselves.



That George Bush found success as a businessman only after the investment of Osama's brother Salem and reputed al Qaeda financier Khalid bin Mahfouz is just one of those things - one of those crazy things.



That Osama bin Laden is known to have been an asset of US foreign policy in no way implies he still is.



That al Qaeda was active in the Balkan conflict, fighting on the same side as the US as recently as 1999, while the US protected its cells, is merely one of history's little aberrations.



The claims of Michael Springman, State Department veteran of the Jeddah visa bureau, that the CIA ran the office and issued visas to al Qaeda members so they could receive training in the United States, sound like the sour grapes of someone who was fired for making such wild accusations.



That one of George Bush's first acts as President, in January 2001, was to end the two-year deployment of attack submarines which were positioned within striking distance of al Qaeda's Afghanistan camps, even as the group's guilt for the Cole bombing was established, proves that a transition from one administration to the next is never an easy task.



That so many influential figures in and close to the Bush White House had expressed, just a year before the attacks, the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" before their militarist ambitions could be fulfilled, demonstrates nothing more than the accidental virtue of being in the right place at the right time.



That the company PTECH, founded by a Saudi financier placed on America's Terrorist Watch List in October 2001, had access to the FAA's entire computer system for two years before the 9/11 attack, means he must not have been such a threat after all.



That whistleblower Indira Singh was told to keep her mouth shut and forget what she learned when she took her concerns about PTECH to her employers and federal authorities, suggests she lacked the big picture. And that the Chief Auditor for JP Morgan Chase told Singh repeatedly, as she answered questions about who supplied her with what information, that "that person should be killed," suggests he should take an anger management seminar.



That on May 8, 2001, Dick Cheney took upon himself the job of co-ordinating a response to domestic terror attacks even as he was crafting the administration's energy policy which bore implications for America's military, circumventing the established infrastructure and ignoring the recommendations of the Hart-Rudman report, merely shows the VP to be someone who finds it hard to delegate.



That the standing order which covered the shooting down of hijacked aircraft was altered on June 1, 2001, taking discretion away from field commanders and placing it solely in the hands of the Secretary of Defense, is simply poor planning and unfortunate timing. Fortunately the error has been corrected, as the order was rescinded shortly after 9/11.



That in the weeks before 9/11, FBI agent Colleen Rowley found her investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui so perversely thwarted that her colleagues joked that bin Laden had a mole at the FBI, proves the stress-relieving virtue of humour in the workplace.



That Dave Frasca of the FBI's Radical Fundamentalist Unit received a promotion after quashing multiple, urgent requests for investigations into al Qaeda assets training at flight schools in the summer of 2001 does appear on the surface odd, but undoubtedly there's a good reason for it, quite possibly classified.



That FBI informant Randy Glass, working an undercover sting, was told by Pakistani intelligence operatives that the World Trade Center towers were coming down, and that his repeated warnings which continued until weeks before the attacks, including the mention of planes used as weapons, were ignored by federal authorities, is simply one of the many "What Ifs" of that tragic day.



That over the summer of 2001 Washington received many urgent, senior-level warnings from foreign intelligence agencies and governments - including those of Germany, France, Great Britain, Russia, Egypt, Israel, Morocco, Afghanistan and others - of impending terror attacks using hijacked aircraft and did nothing, demonstrates the pressing need for a new Intelligence Czar.



That John Ashcroft stopped flying commercial aircraft in July 2001 on account of security considerations had nothing to do with warnings regarding September 11, because he said so to the 9/11 Commission.



That former lead counsel for the House David Schippers says he'd taken to John Ashcroft's office specific warnings he'd learned from FBI agents in New York of an impending attack - even naming the proposed dates, names of the hijackers and the targets - and that the investigations had been stymied and the agents threatened, proves nothing but David Schipper's pathetic need for attention.



That Garth Nicolson received two warnings from contacts in the intelligence community and one from a North African head of state, which included specific site, date and source of the attacks, and passed the information to the Defense Department and the National Security Council to evidently no effect, clearly amounts to nothing, since virtually nobody has ever heard of him.



That in the months prior to September 11, self-described US intelligence operative Delmart Vreeland sought, from a Toronto jail cell, to get US and Canadian authorities to heed his warning of his accidental discovery of impending catastrophic attacks is worthless, since Vreeland was a dubious character, notwithstanding the fact that many of his claims have since been proven true.



That FBI Special Investigator Robert Wright claims that agents assigned to intelligence operations actually protect terrorists from investigation and prosecution, that the FBI shut down his probe into terrorist training camps, and that he was removed from a money-laundering case that had a direct link to terrorism, sounds like yet more sour grapes from a disgruntled employee.



That George Bush had plans to invade Afghanistan on his desk before 9/11 demonstrates only the value of being prepared.



The suggestion that securing a pipeline across Afghanistan figured into the White House's calculations is as ludicrous as the assertion that oil played a part in determining war in Iraq.



That Afghanistan is once again the world's principal heroin producer is an unfortunate reality, but to claim the CIA is still actively involved in the narcotics trade is to presume bad faith on the part of the agency.



Mahmood Ahmed, chief of Pakistan's ISI, must not have authorized an al Qaeda payment of $100,000 to Mohammed Atta days before the attacks, and was not meeting with senior Washington officials over the week of 9/11, because I didn't read anything about him in the official report.



That Porter Goss met with Ahmed the morning of September 11 in his capacity as Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has no bearing whatsoever upon his recent selection by the White House to head the Central Intelligence Agency.



That Goss's congressional seat encompasses the 9/11 hijackers' Florida base of operation, including their flight schools, is precisely the kind of meaningless factoid a conspiracy theorist would bring up.



It's true that George HW Bush and Dick Cheney spent the evening of September 10 alone in the Oval Office, but what's wrong with old colleagues catching up? And it's true that George HW Bush and Shafig bin Laden, Osama's brother, spent the morning of September 11 together at a board meeting of the Carlyle Group, but the bin Ladens are a big family.



That FEMA arrived in New York on Sept 10 to prepare for a scheduled biowarfare drill, and had a triage centre ready to go that was larger and better equipped than the one that was lost in the collapse of WTC 7, was a lucky twist of fate.



Newsweek's report that senior Pentagon officials cancelled flights on Sept 10 for the following day on account of security concerns is only newsworthy because of what happened the following morning.



That George Bush's telephone logs for September 11 do not exist should surprise no one, given the confusion of the day.



That Mohamed Atta attended the International Officer's School at Maxwell Air Force Base, that Abdulaziz Alomari attended Brooks Air Force Base Aerospace Medical School, that Saeed Alghamdi attended the Defense Language Institute in Monterey merely shows it is a small world, after all.



That Lt Col Steve Butler, Vice Chancellor for student affairs of the Defense Language Institute during Alghamdi's terms, was disciplined, removed from his post and threatened with court martial when he wrote "Bush knew of the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism. What is...contemptible is the President of the United States not telling the American people what he knows for political gain," is the least that should have happened for such disrespect shown his Commander in Chief.



That Mohammed Atta dressed like a Mafioso, had a stripper girlfriend, smuggled drugs, was already a licensed pilot when he entered the US, enjoyed pork chops, drank to excess and did cocaine, was closer to Europeans than Arabs in Florida, and included the names of defence contractors on his email list, proves how dangerous the radical fundamentalist Muslim can be.



That 43 lbs of heroin was found on board the Lear Jet owned by Wally Hilliard, the owner of Atta's flight school, just three weeks after Atta enrolled - the biggest seizure ever in Central Florida - was just bad luck. That Hilliard was not charged shows how specious the claims for conspiracy truly are.



That Hilliard's plane had made 30-round trips to Venezuela with the same passengers who always paid cash, that the plane had been supplied by a pair of drug smugglers who had also outfitted CIA drug runner Barry Seal, and that 9/11 commissioner Richard ben-Veniste had been Seal's attorney before Seal's murder, shows nothing but the lengths to which conspiracists will go to draw sinister conclusions.



Reports of insider trading on 9/11 are false, because the SEC investigated and found only respectable investors who will remain nameless involved, and no terrorists, so the windfall profit-taking was merely, as ever, coincidental.



That heightened security for the World Trade Centre was lifted immediately prior to the attacks illustrates that it always happens when you least expect it.



That Hani Hanjour, the pilot of Flight 77, was so incompetent he could not fly a Cessna in August, but in September managed to fly a 767 at excessive speed into a spiraling, 270-degree descent and a level impact of the first floor of the Pentagon, on the only side that was virtually empty and had been hardened to withstand a terrorist attack, merely demonstrates that people can do almost anything once they set their minds to it.



That none of the flight data recorders were said to be recoverable even though they were located in the tail sections, and that until 9/11, no solid-state recorder in a catastrophic crash had been unrecoverable, shows how there's a first time for everything.



That Mohammed Atta left a uniform, a will, a Koran, his driver's license and a "how to fly planes" video in his rental car at the airport means he had other things on his mind.



The mention of Israelis with links to military-intelligence having been arrested on Sept 11 videotaping and celebrating the attacks, of an Israeli espionage ring surveiling DEA and defense installations and trailing the hijackers, and of a warning of impending attacks delivered to the Israeli company Odigo two hours before the first plane hit, does not deserve a response. That the stories also appeared in publications such as Ha'aretz and Forward is a sad display of self-hatred among certain elements of the Israeli media.



That multiple military wargames and simulations were underway the morning of 9/11 - one simulating the crash of a plane into a building; another, a live-fly simulation of multiple hijackings - and took many interceptors away from the eastern seaboard and confused field commanders as to which was a real hijacked aircraft and which was a hoax, was a bizarre coincidence, but no less a coincidence.



That the National Military Command Center ops director asked a rookie substitute to stand his watch at 8:30 am on Sept. 11 is nothing more than bad timing.



That a recording made Sept 11 of air traffic controllers' describing what they had witnessed, was destroyed by an FAA official who crushed it in his hand, cut the tape into little pieces and dropped them in different trash cans around the building, is something no doubt that overzealous official wishes he could undo.



That the FBI knew precisely which Florida flight schools to descend upon hours after the attacks should make every American feel safer knowing their federal agents are on the ball.



That a former flight school executive believes the hijackers were "double agents," and says about Atta and associates, "Early on I gleaned that these guys had government protection. They were let into this country for a specific purpose," and was visited by the FBI just four hours after the attacks to intimidate him into silence, proves he's an unreliable witness, for the simple reason there is no conspiracy.



That Jeb Bush was on board an aircraft that removed flight school records to Washington in the middle of the night on Sept 12th demonstrates how seriously the governor takes the issue of national security.



To insinuate evil motive from the mercy flights of bin Laden family members and Saudi royals after 9/11 shows the sickness of the conspiratorial mindset.



Le Figaro's report in October 2001, known to have originated with French intelligence, that the CIA met Osama bin Laden in a Dubai hospital in July 2001, proves again the perfidy of the French.



That the tape in which bin Laden claims responsibility for the attacks was released by the State Department after having been found providentially by US forces in Afghanistan, and depicts a fattened Osama with a broader face and a flatter nose, proves Osama, and Osama alone, masterminded 9/11.



That at the battle of Tora Bora, where bin Laden was surrounded on three sides, Special Forces received no order to advance and capture him and were forced to stand and watch as two Russian-made helicopters flew into the area where bin Laden was believed hiding, loaded up passengers and returned to Pakistan, demonstrates how confusing the modern battlefield can be.



That upon returning to Fort Bragg from Tora Bora, the same Special Operations troops who had been stood down from capturing bin Laden, suffered a unusual spree of murder/suicides, is nothing more than a series of senseless tragedies.



Reports that bin Laden is currently receiving periodic dialysis treatment in a Pakistani medical hospital are simply too incredible to be true.



That the White House went on Cipro September 11 shows the foresightedness of America's emergency response.



That the anthrax was mailed to perceived liberal media and the Democratic leadership demonstrates only the perversity of the terrorist psyche.



That the anthrax attacks appeared to silence opponents of the Patriot Act shows only that appearances can be deceiving.



That the Ames-strain anthrax was found to have originated at Fort Detrick, and was beyond the capability of all but a few labs to refine, underscores the importance of allowing the investigation to continue without the distraction of absurd conspiracy theories.



That Republican guru Grover Norquist has been found to have aided financiers and supporters of Islamic terror to gain access to the Bush White House, and is a founder of the Islamic Institute, which the Treasury Department believes to be a source of funding for al Qaeda, suggests Norquist is at worst, naive, and at best, needs a wider circle of friends.



That the Department of Justice consistently chooses to see accused 9/11 plotters go free rather than permit the courtroom testimony of al Qaeda leaders in American custody looks bad, but only because we don't have all the facts.



That the White House balked at any inquiry into the events of 9/11, then starved it of funds and stonewalled it, was unfortunate, but since the commission didn't find for conspiracy it's all a non issue anyway.



That the 9/11 commission's executive director and "gatekeeper," Philip Zelikow, was so closely involved in the events under investigation that he testified before the the commission as part of the inquiry, shows only an apparent conflict of interest.



That commission chair Thomas Kean is, like George Bush, a Texas oil executive who had business dealings with reputed al Qaeda financier Khalid bin Mafouz, suggests Texas is smaller than they say it is.



That co-chair Lee Hamilton has a history as a Bush family "fixer," including clearing Bush Sr of the claims arising from the 1980 "October Surprise", is of no concern, since only conspiracists believe there was such a thing as an October Surprise.



That FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds accuses the agency of intentionally fudging specific pre-9/11 warnings and harboring a foreign espionage ring in its translation department, and claims she witnessed evidence of the semi-official infrastructure of money-laundering and narcotics trade behind the attacks, is of no account, since John Ashcroft has gagged her with the rare invocation of "State Secrets Privilege," and retroactively classified her public testimony. For the sake of national security, let us speak no more of her.



That, when commenting on Edmond's case, Daniel Ellsberg remarked that Ashcroft could go to prison for his part in a cover-up, suggests Ellsberg is giving comfort to the terrorists, and could, if he doesn't wise up, find himself declared an enemy combatant.



I could go on. And on and on. But I trust you get the point. Which is simply this: there are no secrets, an American government would never accept civilian casualties for geostrategic gain, and conspiracies are for the weak-minded and gullible.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...