Question:
I wanted to ask a question about 9/11 and YA wont let me.?
2007-11-23 09:37:46 UTC
just wanted peoples views upon weather the towers were blown up in a controled way rather than the "official version"

as there are videos on the web that says otherwise.

and that there was no plane crash at the pentigon rather a missile insted
38 answers:
2007-11-23 09:47:42 UTC
just let these people rest in peace this is old news
Cindy
2007-11-23 09:47:21 UTC
I wrote a lot of papers about the 9/11 conspiracy. the evidence is pretty convincing, but I never believe anything 100%.



The buildings fell at like free-fall speed in about 10 seconds, there was no resistance, so the structure at the bottom of the towers had to have explosives to cause it to the fall that way.



Also, the fact that building 7 fell too, makes it more convincing because the building was located 300feet away, and the other buildings that were closer to the twin towers did not collaspe. There's also been evidence that suggests WTC 7 was a controlled demolision, however, the news states that it is not true. The style of all three buildings suggested a controlled demolision.



A missile is an idea of what hit the pentagon, that's what Loose Change suggests, but that's a little overthetop. The witnesses reported that it looked like a plane, so who knows. It's weird that only one video was released of the attack on the pentagon. There's like around 100 cameras securing that building, it's one of the most secured buildings, and only one tape was able to be released.



There's a lot of skepticism, and some may say it is all consequences but who knows, how many consequences can become suspicious?



Also, 9/11 Mysteries is a good movie about it. It does not suggest that government did it, but it leaves you think of your own opinions. so check that out, also.
2007-11-23 09:44:20 UTC
Honestly I'm not too sure about either of those opinions. I'm not too much into conspiracy of our government. But somethings our government has conspired and risked millions of lives over. Really this issue isn't something people should be making a mockery out of though. Family members died and we all want answers but the only answer they should know is that God had them. I mean if the "official version" was the way those buildings went down then it's sad that people are so judgemental that they are willing to kill millions of people. and if somehow it was a thought out planned version then why did all those people in the planes have to go too? It's confusing and very controversal to bring up subject matter with 9/11 so just be careful with what you place with those numbers. I know I wasn't helpful at all. but be careful!
2007-11-23 23:12:35 UTC
The towers were demolished, no question, if the collapse had been due to the fires then surely the towers would have fallen to one side as the damage was not to the centre of the buildings. Of course a sideways collapse would have taken out most of New York, but would have been more realistic in view of the professed reason for the collapse.
celvin
2007-11-23 10:33:00 UTC
don't know why you weren't allowed to ask- but the WTC 1,2 & 7 were a controlled implosions for sure .

The Pentagon incident is more debatable - but does it really matter what the culprits hit it with as much as who the actual culprits were and why they did what they did? If WTC was an inside job and official cover up --and all the evidence points to it being so-- the whole 9//11 attack had to have been.
2007-11-23 09:50:54 UTC
Sometimes YA are acting very much weird by censoring and removing certain questions and answers which do not violate anything whatsoever. Click on this link to see very interesting video pertaining to 9/11 NY buildings collapse: http://www.911blogger.com/node/10025



In the event if you want to know the latest and uncensored US and World news go to this site: http://www.blacklistednews.com/
2007-11-23 09:47:34 UTC
Mathew......the collapse of the buildings and the crash at the pentagon have been studied by not only the federal government but also the society of civil engineers, National fire protection association, Universtity engineering departments, etc, etc, etc,.....Just ignore these groups of engineers, scientistists, expert in building construction......How could they know more about why the building collapsed than a group of teenage kids intepretting videos?........just ignore the eye witnesses that saw an AIRPLANE hit the pentagon, ignore the the tail section of an airliner sitting on the lawn outside the pentagon (I guess somehow they managed to sneak a 40 foot section of a plane onto the lawn while thousands watched but didnt notice) ..........
pixiechick
2007-11-23 10:01:53 UTC
September 11th was one of the worst things I have ever seen on tv, I found it deeply distressing imagining how desperate those people trapped inside must have been.

I recently watched something on the net which was interesting and quite mind boggling maybe you would like to watch it yourself as it goes into quite alot of stuff and see what you think.

"zeitgeistmovie.com"
2007-11-23 09:50:49 UTC
So innocent, yet so accurate. Let's just hope we're all fighting on the same side..

Hey what you mean like you Renaissance Kid? Good job all those people who think that way aren't as dumb as you and can at least spell correctly eh? Would that mean that you're not as smart as them??
2007-11-23 09:40:58 UTC
i saw those videos too. The controlled thing looks that way because it was put in the building so if it would be a controlled demolition it would not fall on any other buildings. You may want to watch on google video a 3D version of when the plane hit. Another video to watch would be 9-11 justice also on google video
2007-11-23 09:59:59 UTC
I can't decide myself.Thought it was Bin Laden but now I'm not so sure after seeing some documentaries on it. Wouldn't surprise me atall if it was Bush,
j_emmans
2007-11-25 10:02:14 UTC
try to ask in a neutral way it may help.



ie Do you know anyone who .... ? is a third party question and better than a direct question.
Q.
2007-11-24 03:31:58 UTC
excellent question

further in depth information...



there's a lot of these vids but here's one link (copy and paste in address bar)





http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+conspiracy&total=3435&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1
2007-11-23 09:43:52 UTC
Matthew... How would a missile get through the air defense radar without many people seeing it. That's why the terrorist hijacked American planes. Radar would thinking nothing of a Pan Am flight in the air.



Do really believe that hype and doctored videos? A 7 year old can doctor a video. Smarten up.
Laurence B
2007-11-23 09:46:47 UTC
the 9-11 conspiracy theory.



i used to believe in it too.



however, in retrospect i was young and then my mind was weak... these "theories" are the product of extreme organisations working for the extreme political agenda. I have researched the information for myself, some was actualy simply not true.



However... I do not trust the Republican US government, so I would keep my mind open about it.



They should, legally, let you. Otherwise Yahoo! is breaking the law under your freedom of expression, and all that...



:D



Pentagon was a missile, I agree. x
2007-11-23 09:46:04 UTC
Prolly the manner in which you asked your question - and it may be that there was an issue regarding the fact that, as in this posting, you asked more than one question. That's often viewed as a personal rant, not a legitimate question.
2007-11-23 09:54:35 UTC
i believed something else happened at the pentagon.the pentagon had more security cameras pointing at it the anyother building in the world,instead of letting the people see this tradgety of a plane crashing into it they confiscated every security camera video even ones from the hotel across the street,and never released them to the public,sound like someone got something to hide.

and if they released the video this would shut people up about conspiracy
Eraserhead
2007-11-23 09:41:26 UTC
Do some actual research on this, and you'll find that these theories are not only dumb but incredibly insulting to those who lost their lives that day. And all the witnesses at the Pentagon, and WTC who watched it all go down. It's not even worth arguing over because what you believe is soooo far fetched, it's like saying the holocaust never happened. It's just ridiculous in the extreme.
2007-11-23 09:40:57 UTC
i think that they were partly controled, and partly not controled. They wanted to kill everyone, but they only killed 3/4. umm. i know it's harsh, i am really sorry if one of your loved ones died, but i also think it was controled because they meant to crash the plane, and they did. =(
2007-11-23 09:41:22 UTC
honestly many people believe that it was planned attack totally controlled but most of society is all pushovers.
?
2007-11-23 09:40:37 UTC
im not so sure, people on here sometimes make things up so do some reaserch, go tot he public library near you and ask others like teachers and parents ect. Good luck :)
2007-11-23 09:42:26 UTC
I believe it was a publicity stunt by the government, because the idea of terrorism doesn't make sense
Mike
2007-11-23 09:46:43 UTC
you believe that was the Planes??come on man,,,use you mind,,,,,it's the USA ,,,it's being run by mafias and you poor people still believe that those inccont Muslim people or who ever did it???then trust me you need to grow up and stop being so fool....you need to seek the truth.....you need to stop believing and what you see on BBC and so.....well bro you must be a Wise man to ask at least you ain't a donkey who believes what ever they hear...Good luck
mirage
2007-11-23 09:40:02 UTC
thats weird.. try again.. <3
2007-11-23 12:47:49 UTC
so your one of those nut jobs. I pity people like you.
Stuart
2007-11-23 09:41:13 UTC
Well, here's the part of the issue where you now have to tell the truth: what do you mean "...YA wont let me.? ..."



I do not believe YA won't let you ask. That means you are not credible in my book. That means I'm not even going to give the rest of your typing a look.
Mencken
2007-11-23 09:47:36 UTC
9-11 is the most outrageous conspiracy (among a host of conspiracies) that the ruling elite have ever promoted against our own society.



Our nation's history is packed so full of conspiracies

that it is utterly ridiculous to pretend that they

don't exist. In fact, many people go to prison

every year convicted of conspiracy (most of them

Republicans). The Bush cabal hardly goes a week

without being involved in some type of conspiracy. The

U.S. Attorney's purge immediately comes to mind but

the entire push for war against Iran is a conspiracy.

Iran possessing nuclear weapons is hardly the real

issue. Obviously, Iran couldn't use a nuclear weapon

without ensuring their own destruction

by a much superior, rogue nuclear force -- the U.S.

The issue regarding Iran is one of imperialist

domination. The U.S. has targeted much of the Middle

East for its own imperialist interests.

Were Iran to develop nuclear weapons it would ensure

that Iran would not be subject to that imperialist

domination.



Other recent conspiracies of note include the Enron

conspiracy and the Jack Abramoff scandal. Both of

which involved members of the Bush cabal. Among the

most well-known recent conspiracies are the

2000 election, 9-11 (9-11 is a conspiracy even if the

government's account is taken at face value -- which,

of course, it shouldn't be), Iraq has weapons of mass

destruction, the 2004 election, Iran contra, CIA

introducing crack cocaine into the impoverished Black

neighborhoods of Los Angeles, Watergate, the Watergate

cover-up, the Savings and Loan scandal, Gulf of Tonkin

(never happened), the JFK assassination, the JFK

assassination cover-up Cointelpro, MKULTRA, Roosevelt

encouraged the attack on Pearl Harbor and knew the

Japanese were coming, Nixon/Kissinger involvement in

the overthrow of Salvadore Allende and installation of

Pinochet, Kermit Roosevelt and the overthrow of Iran's

democratically elected leader Mohammed Mossadeq, the

creation of the Federal Reserve(a private entity

created and organized under tremendous secrecy

designed to enrich a handful of bankers), the Robber

Baron's and their accumulation of great wealth by

conspiring with politicians to loot the treasury

during the building of the railroad. Other, long

forgotten conspiracies include the Credit Mobilier

Scandal and the Teapot Dome scandal. And I'm sure

there are many, many more.



Additionally, a 9-11 type of false-flag terrorism

event was previously planned in the the U.S. Operation

Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a 1962 plan by the US

Department of Defense to cause acts of simulated or

real terrorism and violence on US soil or against US

interests, blamed on Cuba, in order to generate U.S.

public support for military action against the Cuban

government of Fidel Castro. As part of the U.S.

government's Operation Mongoose anti-Castro

initiative, the plan, which was not implemented,

called for various false flag actions, including

simulated or real state-sponsored acts of terrorism

(such as hijacked planes) on U.S. and Cuban soil. The

plan was proposed by senior U.S. Department of Defense

leaders, including the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of

Staff Lyman Louis Lemnitzer.



These quotes by people in positions to know are quite

revealing of the fact that we live in a world

dominated by conspiracies among the well-connected and

powerful wealthy elite.



-----------------------



"In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it

happens, you can bet it was planned that way." -

Franklin D. Roosevelt



“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's

views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest

men in the United States —in the fields of commerce

and manufacturing—are afraid of somebody. They know

that there is a power somewhere so organized, so

subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so

pervasive, that they had better not speak above their

breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” -

Woodrow Wilson



“A financial element in the large centers has owned

the government since the days of Andrew Jackson.” -

Franklin Roosevelt



“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All

we need is the right major crisis and the nations will

accept the New World Order.” - David Rockefeller



“Today, America would be outraged if UN troops entered

Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be

grateful! This is especially true if they were told

that there was an outside threat from beyond, whether

real or promulgated, that threatened our very

existence. It is then that all people of the world

will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one

thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented

with this scenario, individual rights will be

willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their

well-being granted to them by the world government.” -

Henry Kissinger (Bilderburg Conference 1991 Evians,

France)



“Naturally the common people don't want war…but after

all, it is the leaders of the country who determine

policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the

people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist

dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist

dictatorship…all you have to do is to tell them they

are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for

lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger.

It works the same way in any country.” Herman Goering

( One of Hitler's top men, during the Nuremberg

Trials)



The individual is handicapped by coming face to face

with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it

exists. - Edgar J Hoover



In 1913, Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve

Act. A few years later he wrote: "I am a most unhappy

man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great

industrial nation is controlled by its system of

credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The

growth of the nation, therefore, and all our

activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come

to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most

completely controlled and dominated Governments in the

civilized world no longer a Government by free

opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the

vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion

and duress of a small group of dominant men."





The easiest way to gain control of the population is

to carry out acts of terror. The public will clamor

for such laws if the personal security is threatened.

- Joseph Stalin





The real rulers of Washington are Invisible and

exercise power from behind the scenes. - Justice Felix

Frankfurter - US Supreme Court Justice



The real menace of our Republic is the invisible

Government which like a giant Octopus, sprawls its

slimy legs over our cities, states, and nation. - John

F. Hylan - Mayor NYC 1918-1925



"Give me control of a Nation's money and I care not

who makes the laws." - Mayer Amschel Bauer

(Rothschild)



"We shall have World Government. Whether or not we

like it. The only Question is whether World Government

will be achieved by conquest or consent." - James Paul

Warburg , Foreign agent for the Rothschild dynasty -

Major Player in the Federal Reserve act scam / Feb.

17, 1950 speaking before the U.S. Senate.



"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the NY Times,

Time Magazine, and other great publications whose

directors have attended our meetings, and respected

their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It

would have been impossible for us to develop OUR PLAN

for the world if we had been subjected to the lights

of publicity during those years. But, the world is now

more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a

World Government. The supranational sovereignty of an

intellectual ELITE and World Bankers is surely

preferable to the national auto - determination

practiced in past centuries." - David Rockefeller CFR

Kingpin, Founder of the Trilateral Commission, NOW

Godfather / June 1991



"It is well enough that people of the nation do not

understand our Banking and Monetary system, for if

they did, I believe there would be a Revolution before

tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford





"For more than a century, ideological extremists at

either end of the political spectrum have seized upon

well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller

family for the inordinate influence they claim we

wield over American political and economic

institutions. Some even believe we are part of a

secret cabal working against the best interests of the

United States, characterizing my family and me as

'internationalists' and of conspiring with others

around the world to build a more integrated global

political and economic structure - one world, if you

will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am

proud of it." - David Rockefeller, Memoirs , 2002



“Every time we do something, you tell me America will

do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you

something very clear: Don't worry about American

pressure on Israel . We, the Jewish people, control

America , and the Americans know it.” - Ariel Sharon ,

October 3, 2001



"I came to America because of the great, great freedom

which I heard existed in this country. I made a

mistake in selecting America as a land of freedom, a

mistake I cannot repair in the balance of my

lifetime." - Albert Einstein, 1947



"I believe that banking institutions are more

dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If

the American people ever allow private banks to

control the issue of their currency, first by

inflation, then by deflation, the banks and

corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will

deprive the people of all property until their

children wake-up homeless on the continent their

fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken

from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it

properly belongs." -- Thomas Jefferson



1941: On November 25, 1941, two weeks before the

Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Secretary of War

Henry Stimson (S&B, CFR) wrote about his meeting with

President Roosevelt that day. He stated that the

Roosevelt Administration was trying to see how they

could maneuver the Japanese into firing the first shot

in order to bring the United States into the war. He

wrote: "There the President . . . brought up entirely

the relations with the Japanese. He brought up the

event that we were likely to be attacked perhaps next

Monday, for the Japanese are notorious for making an

attack without warning, and the question was what we

should do. The question was how we should maneuver

them into the position of firing the first shot

without allowing too much danger to ourselves."
2007-11-23 09:41:04 UTC
huh sounds like the goverment has it good with yahoo

i bet those goverment a**wipes did it :( grr
2007-11-23 09:45:10 UTC
its because its old news and has been done to death and people do not want to hear all the conispiracy theroy crap again and again and again............there were no missiles or controlled exposions....get over it and get a life
2007-11-23 09:41:49 UTC
It was an inside bomb



You can do your research if you don't believe it
2007-11-23 10:39:11 UTC
No, the towers were not blown up in a controlled demolition, nor did a missile hit the Pentagon.



1. Essentially all demolition experts say the collapse didn’t look like a “controlled demolition.”



Here’s an article from the world-renowned journal, “Implosion World” that destroys the “controlled demolition theory” :



http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf



2. A missile definitely didn't hit the Pentagon. Here's how we know:



(a) Dozens, if not hundreds, of people stuck on I-395 saw the low-flying plane & their testimony is well-documented in the press. There's of list of them, with their names & where they were quoted in Wikipedia, “American Airlines Flight 77”:



(b) Clear wreckage of a plane was found & photographs were printed in all the papers. Here's a nice photo from 9/11 that clearly shows plane wreckage:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=6#bigplane

(scroll down after clicking). Many engine parts were found.



(c)Yes, the hole in the Pentagon was somewhat smaller than the diameter of the plane. This is explained by Professor Mere Sozen, a “Kettelhut Distinguished Professor Civil Engineering” at Perdue University. Sozen says that it’s the energy of the plane, not its size that determines the size of the hole. The plane is not a cartoon character that punches out its outline. Moving at 531 MPH it more fluid than solid and this explains why you get the hole you got. See:

http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html



(d) If a missisle did hit the Pentagon, then where did the Plane (Flight 77) & all it passengers go?



PUBLISHED EXPERTS ON THE 9/11 ATTACKS



It's important to note that every single published journal article on the face of the earth has rejected the conspriacy theory.



It's really amazing.



Long lists of supposed experts that have published nothing prove nothing. Real science lies in journals that can be peer-reviewed by other experts.



Here's what REAL experts say about 9/11, and they ALL have references:



-- The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057



-- Massachusetts Institute of Technology. See http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/



--NIST (National Institute on Science and Technology):

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

Also see the lead investigator of NIST explain the collapse at

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/

Click on "Impact to Collapse"



-- The leading demolition journal in the world is against the conspiracy theorists:

http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf



-- Purdue (http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html



--Professor Bazant (Northwestern Dept of Civil Engineering) is one of only 14 people to win the Prager Award in engineering. He first described the collapse mechanism as follows: http://www.debunking911.com/ProgressiveCollapseWTC-6-23-2006.pdf



--FEMA along with American Society of Civil Engineers, did an extensive analysis of the WTC collapse (ASCE/FEMA World Trade Center Building Performance Study (BPS) Team)

http://www.fema.gov/rebuild/mat/mat_fema403.shtm

It’s useful to see the investigation team & their credentials at: http://www.asce.org/responds/wtc_team.cfm



-- Popular Mechanics published a huge article citing 300 renowned experts in demolition & engineering.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html



-- Columbia University has permanent seismographic recorders that was running on 9/11 which clearly show no explosives during the collapse of Towers 1 & 2, or of WTC7 . See page 2 of

http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf



--The “American Society of Civil Engineers” & the “Structural Engineering Institute” (both are non-governmental) investigated the Pentagon crash. Their report is called "The Pentagon Performance Report" & it’s at:

http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf



-- Scientific American. See

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000DA0E2-1E15-128A-9E1583414B7F0000



“Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation”

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html



“Engineers Explain WTC Collapse”

http://www.architectureweek.com/2002/0529/news_3-1.html



“Twin towers research refutes 9/11 conspiracy theories”

http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/research/story/0,,2166832,00.html



“Report Ties WTC Collapses to Column Failures”

http://enr.construction.com/news/buildings/archives/040119.asp



“It was the fire, caused the twin tower collapse”

http://www.icivilengineer.com/News/WTC/Fire.html



“Simulation for the collapse of WTC after aeroplane impact “

http://www.luxinzheng.net/publications/english_WTC.htm

Lu XZ., Yang N., Jiang JJ. Structure Engineer, 66(sup.). 2003, 18-22



“Elaboration on Aspects of the Postulated Collapse of the World Trade Centre Twin Towers “

HERA: Innovation in Metals. 2001. 13 December 2001.

http://www.hera.org.nz/PDF%20Files/Elaboration%20on%20WTC%20Paper.PDF



Monahan, B.

"World Trade Center Collapse-Civil Engineering Considerations"

Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction v. 7, no. 3, (2002): 134-135.

http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PPSCFX000007000003000134000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=Yes



Newland, D.E., & Cebon, D.

"Could the World Trade Center Have Been Modified to Prevent Its Collapse?"

Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 7, (2002):795-800.

http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=JENMDT000128000007000795000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=Yes



REMEMBER: There is not a single solitary scientific journal article in support of the conspiracy theory. The conspiracy folks can't get anything published becuase the scientific world has rejected their ideas, utterly.



Essentially, there is no counter-argument to this.

=======================

ADDITIONAL INFO ON THE 9/11 COMMISSION



All the Chair & Vice Chair (of the 9/11 Commission) did was complain a little about lack of money, in-fighting, and politicking. They never, ever, ever felt there was governmental conspiracy on 9/11.



The above info comes from their book “Without Precedent.” The Publishers Weekly review of this book says, QUOTE: “The authors [the Chair & Vice Chair] cogently defend the compromises they made and swat conspiracy theories about coverups”



You can read the Publishers Weekly review at

http://www.amazon.com/Without-Precedent-Inside-Commission-Vintage/dp/0307276635/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-8102750-4352722?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190763902&sr=8-1
2007-11-23 09:43:40 UTC
Maybe they just got tired of having that question asked since it has been debunked so completely.
2007-11-23 09:40:04 UTC
Well, they have let you say that...
Major Dan
2007-11-23 09:40:21 UTC
Maybe they are tired of the tinfoileys asking that same question over and over again, day after day, night after night. Moreover, you just asked it didn't you?
2007-11-23 09:48:30 UTC
Don't fall for those conspacy theories. Those people just like to make up that stuff to make people think the are smarter. But they only make themselves look dumb.
T-Bone
2007-11-23 09:40:38 UTC
To Quote Bill Clinton.... "How Dare You !!!"
♥ ♥ C.J. ♥ ♥
2007-11-23 09:40:05 UTC
it was the planes. no missiles.
Trevor S
2007-11-23 10:04:51 UTC
http://www.truthnews.us/?p=840



-----------------------------------



9/11 Truthers are Nuts! Or are they?





Let’s take a look:



MILITARY LEADERS



Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President

Ronald Reagan (Col. Ronald D. Ray) said that the

official story of 9/11 is “the dog that doesn’t hunt”

(bio)



Director of the U.S. “Star Wars” space defense program

in both Republican and Democratic administrations, who

was a senior air force colonel who flew 101 combat

missions (Col. Robert Bowman) stated that 9/11 was an

inside job. He also said:



“If our government had merely [done] nothing, and I

say that as an old interceptor pilot—I know the drill,

I know what it takes, I know how long it takes, I know

what the procedures are, I know what they were, and I

know what they’ve changed them to—if our government

had merely done nothing, and allowed normal procedures

to happen on that morning of 9/11, the Twin Towers

would still be standing and thousands of dead

Americans would still be alive. [T]hat is treason!“



U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director,

decorated with the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star and

the Soldiers Medal (Capt. Daniel Davis) stated:



“there is no way that an aircraft . . . would not be

intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan,

turn off their transponders, or stop communication

with Air Traffic Control … Attempts to obscure facts

by calling them a ‘conspiracy Theory’ does not change

the truth. It seems, ‘Something is rotten in the

State.’ “



President of the U.S. Air Force Accident Investigation

Board, who also served as Pentagon Weapons Requirement

Officer and as a member of the Pentagon’s Quadrennial

Defense Review, and who was awarded Distinguished

Flying Crosses for Heroism, four Air Medals, four

Meritorious Service Medals, and nine Aerial

Achievement Medals (Lt. Col. Jeff Latas) is a member

of a group which doubts the government’s version of

9/11



U.S. General, Commanding General of U.S. European

Command and Supreme Allied Commander Europe, decorated

with the Bronze Star, Silver Star, and Purple Heart

(General Wesley Clark) said “We’ve never finished the

investigation of 9/11 and whether the administration

actually misused the intelligence information it had.

The evidence seems pretty clear to me. I’ve seen that

for a long time.”



Air Force Colonel and key Pentagon official (Lt.

Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski) finds various aspects of

9/11 suspicious



Lieutenant colonel, 24-year Air Force career, Vice

Chancellor for Student Affairs at the Defense Language

Institute (Lt. Colonel Steve Butler) said “Of course

Bush knew about the impending attacks on America. He

did nothing to warn the American people because he

needed this war on terrorism.”



Two-Star general (Major General Albert Stubbelbine)

questions the attack on the Pentagon



U.S. Air Force fighter pilot, former instructor at the

USAF Fighter Weapons School and NATO’s Tactical

Leadership Program, with a 20-year Air Force career

(Lt. Colonel Guy S. Razer) said the following:



“I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11,

2001 were planned, organized, and committed by

treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the

highest levels of our government ….



Those of us in the military took an oath to “support

and defend the Constitution of the United States

against all enemies, foreign and domestic”. Just

because we have retired does not make that oath

invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is

our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and

bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how

long it takes, or how much we have to suffer to do it.



We owe it to those who have gone before us who

executed that same oath, and who are doing the same

thing in Iraq and Afghanistan right now. Those of us

who joined the military and faithfully executed orders

that were given us had to trust our leaders. The

violation and abuse of that trust is not only heinous,

but ultimately the most accurate definition of

treason!”



U.S. Marine Corps lieutenant colonel, a fighter pilot

with over 300 combat missions flown and a 21-year

Marine Corps career (Lt. Colonel Shelton F. Lankford)

believes that 9/11 was an inside job, and said:



“This isn’t about party, it isn’t about Bush Bashing.

It’s about our country, our constitution, and our

future. …



Your countrymen have been murdered and the more you

delve into it the more it looks as though they were

murdered by our government, who used it as an excuse

to murder other people thousands of miles away.



If you ridicule others who have sincere doubts and who

know factual information that directly contradicts the

official report and who want explanations from those

who hold the keys to our government, and have motive,

means, and opportunity to pull off a 9/11, but you are

too lazy or fearful, or … to check into the facts

yourself, what does that make you? ….



Are you afraid that you will learn the truth and you

can’t handle it? …”



U.S. Navy ‘Top Gun’ pilot (Commander Ralph Kolstad)

who questions the official account of 9/11 and is

calling for a new investigation, says “When one starts

using his own mind, and not what one was told, there

is very little to believe in the official story”.



The Group Director on matters of national security in

the U.S. Government Accountability Office said that

President Bush did not respond to unprecedented

warnings of the 9/11 disaster and conducted a massive

cover-up instead of accepting responsibility



Additionally, numerous military leaders from allied

governments have questioned 9/11, such as:



Canadian Minister of Defense, the top military leader

of Canada (Paul Hellyer)



Assistant German Defense Minister (Andreas Von Bulow)



Commander-in-chief of the Russian Navy (Anatoli

Kornukov)



Chief of staff of the Russian armed forces (General

Leonid Ivashov)



INTELLIGENCE PROFESSIONALS



A 27-year CIA veteran, who chaired National

Intelligence Estimates and personally delivered

intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and

George H.W. Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries

of State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many other

senior government officials (Raymond McGovern) said “I

think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11

Report is a joke”, and is open to the possibility that

9/11 was an inside job.



A 29-year CIA veteran, former National Intelligence

Officer (NIO) and former Director of the CIA’s Office

of Regional and Political Analysis (William Bill

Christison) said “I now think there is persuasive

evidence that the events of September did not unfold

as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission

would have us believe. … All three [buildings that

were destroyed in the World Trade Center] were most

probably destroyed by controlled demolition charges

placed in the buildings before 9/11.” (and see this).



20-year Marine Corps infantry and intelligence

officer, the second-ranking civilian in U.S. Marine

Corps Intelligence, and former CIA clandestine

services case officer (David Steele) stated that “9/11

was at a minimum allowed to happen as a pretext for

war”, and it was probably an inside job (see Customer

Review dated October 7, 2006).



A decorated 20-year CIA veteran, whose Pulitzer-Prize

winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh called

“perhaps the best on-the-ground field officer in the

Middle East”, and astounding career formed the script

for the Academy Award winning motion picture Syriana

(Robert Baer) said that“the evidence points at” 9/11

having had aspects of being an inside job .



The Division Chief of the CIA’s Office of Soviet

Affairs, who served as Senior Analyst from 1966 -

1990. He also served as Professor of International

Security at the National War College from 1986 - 2004

(Melvin Goodman) said “The final [9/11 Commission]

report is ultimately a coverup.”



Professor of History and International Relations,

University of Maryland. Former Executive Assistant to

the Director of the National Security Agency. Former

military attaché in China. 21-year career in U.S. Army

Intelligence (Major John M. Newman, PhD, U.S. Army)

questions the government’s version of the events of

9/11.



The head of all U.S. intelligence, the Director of

National Intelligence (Mike McConnel) said “9/11

should have and could have been prevented”



9/11 COMMISSIONERS



The 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials

lied to the Commission, and considered recommending

criminal charges for such false statements, yet didn’t

bother to tell the American people (free subscription

required).



Indeed, the co-chairs of the Commission (Thomas Keane

and Lee Hamilton) now admit that the Commission

largely operated based upon political considerations.



9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says “I don’t

believe for a minute we got everything right”, that

the Commission was set up to fail, that people should

keep asking questions about 9/11, that the 9/11 debate

should continue, and that the 9/11 Commission report

was only “the first draft” of history.





9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that “There are

ample reasons to suspect that there may be some

alternative to what we outlined in our version . . .

We didn’t have access . . . .”





9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said “We were

extremely frustrated with the false statements we were

getting”





Former 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the

Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”; “This

investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these

days we will have to get the full story because the

9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White

House wants to cover it up”.





The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John

Farmer) who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry, said “I was

shocked at how different the truth was from the way it

was described …. The tapes told a radically different

story from what had been told to us and the public for

two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.”



SCIENTISTS



A prominent physicist with 33 years of service for the

Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC (Dr. David

L. Griscom) said that the official theory for why the

Twin Towers and world trade center building 7

collapsed “does not match the available facts” and

supports the theory that the buildings were brought

down by controlled demolition

A world-renowned scientist, recipient of the National

Medal of Science, America’s highest honor for

scientific achievement (Dr. Lynn Margulis) said:



“I suggest that those of us aware and concerned demand

that the glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11

be dismissed as a fraud and a new, thorough, and

impartial investigation be undertaken.“



The former head of the Fire Science Division of the

government agency which claims that the World Trade

Centers collapsed due to fire (the National Institute

of Standards and Technology), who is a Ph.D. in

mechanical engineering, with more than 25 years

experience in fire research and its applications, and

is a professor in the Department of Fire Protection

Engineering at the University of Maryland (Dr. James

Quintiere), called for an independent review of the

World Trade Center Twin Tower collapse investigation.

“I wish that there would be a peer review of this,” he

said, referring to the NIST investigation. “I think

all the records that NIST has assembled should be

archived. I would really like to see someone else take

a look at what they’ve done; both structurally and

from a fire point of view. … I think the official

conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable.”

Former Director for Research, Director for

Aeronautical Projects, and Flight Research Program

Manager for NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center, who

holds masters degrees in both physics and engineering

(Dwain A. Deets) says:



“The many visual images (massive structural members

being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds,

etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were

involved [in the destruction of the World Trade

Centers on 9/11].”



A prominent physicist, former U.S. professor of

physics from a top university, and a former principal

investigator for the U.S. Department of Energy,

Division of Advanced Energy Projects (Dr. Steven E.

Jones) stated that the world trade centers were

brought down by controlled demolition



A U.S. physics professor who teaches at several

universities (Dr. Crockett Grabbe) believes that the

World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled

demolition



An expert on demolition (Bent Lund) said that the

trade centers were brought down with explosives (in

Danish)



A Dutch demolition expert (Danny Jowenko) stated that

WTC 7 was imploded



A safety engineer and accident analyst for the Finnish

National Safety Technology Authority (Dr. Heikki

Kurttila) stated regarding WTC 7 that “The great speed

of the collapse and the low value of the resistance

factor strongly suggest controlled demolition.”A

13-year professor of metallurgical engineering at a

U.S. university, with a PhD in materials engineering,

a former Congressional Office of Technology Assessment

Senior Staff Member (Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn), is

calling for a new investigation of 9/11



A Danish professor of chemistry (Dr. Niels Harrit)

said, in a mainstream Danish newspaper, “WTC7

collapsed exactly like a house of cards. If the fires

or damage in one corner had played a decisive role,

the building would have fallen in that direction. You

don’t have to be a woodcutter to grasp this”

(translated)



A former guidance systems engineer for Polaris and

Trident missiles and professor emeritus, mathematics

and computer science at a university concluded (Dr.

Bruce R. Henry) that the Twin Towers “were brought

down by planted explosives.”

A professor of mathematics (Gary Welz) said “The

official explanation that I’ve heard doesn’t make

sense because it doesn’t explain why I heard and felt

an explosion before the South Tower fell and why the

concrete was pulverized”



STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS

A prominent engineer with 55 years experience, in

charge of the design of hundreds of major building

projects including high rise offices, former member of

the California Seismic Safety Commission and former

member of the National Institute of Sciences Building

Safety Council (Marx Ayres) believes that the World

Trade Centers were brought down by controlled

demolition (see also this)



Two professors of structural engineering at a

prestigious Swiss university (Dr. Joerg Schneider and

Dr. Hugo Bachmann) said that, on 9/11, World Trade

Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition

(translation here)



Charles Pegelow, structural engineer, of Houston,

Texas (and see this)



Dennis Kollar, structural engineer, of West Bend,

Wisconsin



Doyle Winterton, structural engineer (retired)



Haluk Akol, Structural Engineer and architect (ret.)



William Rice, P.E., structural engineer, former

professor of Vermont Technical College



An architect, member of the American Institute of

Architects, who has been a practicing architect for 20

years and has been responsible for the production of

construction documents for numerous steel-framed and

fire-protected buildings for uses in many different

areas, including education, civic, rapid transit and

industrial use (Richard Gage) disputes the claim that

fire and airplane damage brought down the World Trade

Centers and believes there is strong evidence of

controlled demolition (many other architects who

question 9/11 are listed here)



LEGAL SCHOLARS



Former Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special

Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice under

Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan; former U.S.

Army Intelligence officer, and currently a

widely-sought media commentator on terrorism and

intelligence services (John Loftus) questions the

government’s version of 9/11.



Former Inspector General, U.S. Department of

Transportation; former Professor of Aviation, Dept. of

Aerospace Engineering and Aviation and Professor of

Public Policy, Ohio State University (Mary Schiavo)

questions the government’s version of 9/11.



Professor of International Law at the University of

Illinois, Champaign; a leading practitioner and

advocate of international law; responsible for

drafting the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of

1989, the American implementing legislation for the

1972 Biological Weapons Convention; served on the

Board of Directors of Amnesty International

(1988-1992), and represented Bosnia- Herzegovina at

the World Court, with a Doctor of Law Magna *** Laude

as well as a Ph.D. in Political Science, both from

Harvard University (Dr. Francis Boyle) questions the

government’s version of 9/11.



Former prosecutor in the Organized Crime and

Racketeering Section of the U.S. Justice Department

and a key member of Attorney General Bobby Kennedy’s

anti-corruption task force; former assistant U.S.

Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois (J.

Terrence “Terry” Brunner) questions the government’s

version of 9/11.



Professor Emeritus, International Law, Professor of

Politics and International Affairs, Princeton

University; in 2001 served on the three-person UN

Commission on Human Rights for the Palestine

Territories, and previously, on the Independent

International Commission on Kosovo (Richard Falk)

questions the government’s version of 9/11.



Bessie Dutton Murray Distinguished Professor of Law

Emeritus and Director, Center for Human Rights,

University of Iowa; Fellow, World Academy of Art and

Science. Honorary Editor, Board of Editors, American

Journal of International Law (Burns H. Weston)

questions the government’s version of 9/11.



Former president of the National Lawyers Guild (C.

Peter Erlinder), who signed a petition calling for a

real investigation into 9/11. And see petition.



Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice at Troy

University; associate General Counsel, National

Association of Federal Agents; Retired Agent in

Charge, Internal Affairs, U.S. Customs, responsible

for the internal integrity and security for areas

encompassing nine states and two foreign locations;

former Federal Sky Marshall; 27-year U.S. Customs

career (Mark Conrad) questions the government’s

version of 9/11.



Professor of Law, University of Freiburg; former

Minister of Justice of West Germany (Horst Ehmke)

questions the government’s version of 9/11.



Director of Academic Programs, Institute for Policy

and Economic Development, University of Texas, El

Paso, specializing in executive branch secrecy policy,

governmental abuse, and law and bureaucracy; former

U.S. Army Signals Intelligence officer; author of

several books on law and political theory (Dr. William

G. Weaver) questions the government’s version of 9/11.



Famed trial attorney (Gerry Spence) questions the

government’s version of 9/11.



Former Instructor of Criminal Trial Practice, Boalt

Hall School of Law, University of California at

Berkeley 11-year teaching career. Retired Chief

Assistant Public Defender, Contra Costa County,

California 31-year career (William Veale) said:



“When you grow up in the United States, there are some

bedrock principles that require concerted effort to

discard. One is the simplest: that our leaders are

good and decent people whose efforts may occasionally

warrant criticism but never because of malice or

venality… But one grows up. … And with the lawyer’s

training comes the reliance on evidence and the facts

that persuade… After a lot of reading, thought, study,

and commiseration, I have come to the conclusion that

the attacks of 9/11 were, in their essence, an inside

job perpetrated at the highest levels of the U S

government.”



MEMBERS OF CONGRESS



Current U.S. Senator (Patrick Leahy) states “The two

questions that the congress will not ask . . . is why

did 9/11 happen on George Bush’s watch when he had

clear warnings that it was going to happen? Why did

they allow it to happen?”



Current Republican Congressman (Ron Paul) states that

“we see the [9/11] investigations that have been done

so far as more or less cover-up and no real

explanation of what went on”



Current Democratic Congressman (Dennis Kucinich) hints

that we aren’t being told the truth about 9/11



Former Democratic Senator (Mike Gravel) states that he

supports a new 9/11 investigation and that we don’t

know the truth about 9/11



Former U.S. Republican Congressman and senior member

of the House Armed Services Committee, and who served

six years as the Chairman of the Military Research and

Development Subcommittee (Curt Weldon) has shown that

the U.S. tracked hijackers before 9/11, is open to

hearing information about explosives in the Twin

Towers, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was

an inside job



FAMILY MEMBERS AND HEROIC FIRST RESPONDERS



A common criticism of those who question 9/11 is that

they are being “disrespectful to the victims and their

families”.



However, half of the victim’s families believe that

9/11 was an inside job (according to the head of the

largest 9/11 family group, Bill Doyle) (and listen to

this interview). Many family and friends of victims

not only support the search for 9/11 truth, but they

demand it (please ignore the partisan tone). See also

this interview.



Indeed, it has now become so clear that the 9/11

Commission was a whitewash that the same 9/11 widows

who called for the creation of the 9/11 Commission are

now demanding a NEW investigation (see also this

video).



And dying heroes, soon-to-be victims themselves, the

first responders who worked tirelessly to save lives

on and after 9/11, say that controlled demolition

brought down the Twin Towers and that a real

investigation is necessary.



PSYCHIATRISTS AND PSYCHOLOGISTS



Finally, those who attack people who question the

government’s version of 9/11 as “crazy” may wish to

review the list of mental health professionals who

have concluded that the official version of 9/11 is

false:



Psychiatrist Carol S. Wolman, MD



Psychiatrist E. Martin Schotz



Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and

Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center,

as well as Radiology, at Duke University Medical

Center D. Lawrence Burk, Jr., MD



Board of Governors Distinguished Service Professor of

Psychology and Associate Dean of the Graduate School

at Ruters University Barry R. Komisaruk



Professor of Psychology at University of New Hampshire

William Woodward



Professor of Psychology at University of Essex Philip

Cozzolino



Professor of Psychology at Goddard College Catherine

Lowther



Professor Emeritus of Psychology at California

Institute of Integral Studies Ralph Metzner



Professor of Psychology at Rhodes University Mike

Earl-Taylor



Retired Professor of Psychology at Oxford University

Graham Harris



Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from the University of

Nebraska and licensed Psychologist Ronald Feintech



Ph.D. Clinical Neuropsychologist Richard Welser



THOUSANDS OF OTHERS



The roster above is only a sample. There are too many

Ph.D. scientists and engineers, architects, military

and intelligence officials, politicians, legal

scholars and other highly-credible people who question

9/11 — literally thousands — to list in one place.

Here are a few additional people to consider:



The former director of the FBI (Louis Freeh) says

there was a cover up by the 9/11 Commission



Former air traffic controller, who knows the flight

corridor which the two planes which hit the Twin

Towers flew “like the back of my hand” and who handled

two actual hijackings (Robin Hordon) says that 9/11

could not have occurred as the government says, and

that planes can be tracked on radar even when their

transponders are turned off (also, listen to this

interview)



Perhaps “the premiere collapse expert in the country”,

who 9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer referred to as a

“very, very respected expert on building collapse”,

the head of the New York Fire Department’s Special

Operations Command and the most highly decorated

firefighter in its NYFD history, who had previously

“commanded rescue operations at many difficult and

complex disasters, including the Oklahoma City

Bombing, the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing, and many

natural disasters worldwide” thought that the collapse

of the South Tower was caused by bombs, because the

collapse of the building was too even to have been

caused by anything else (pages 5-6).



Former Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning

under Nixon, Ford, and Carter (Morton Goulder), former

former Deputy Director to the White House Task Force

on Terrorism (Edward L. Peck), and former US

Department of State Foreign Service Officer (J.

Michael Springmann), as well as a who’s who of

liberals and independents) jointly call for a new

investigation into 9/11



Former FBI agent (Robert Wright) says “The FBI, rather

than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, was merely

gathering intelligence so they would know who to

arrest when a terrorist attack occurred.”



Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg said

that some of the claims concerning government

involvement in 9/11 are credible, that “very serious

questions have been raised about what they [U.S.

government officials] knew beforehand and how much

involvement there might have been”, that engineering

9/11 would not be humanly or psychologically beyond

the scope of the current administration, and that

there’s enough evidence to justify a new,

“hard-hitting” investigation into 9/11 with subpoenas

and testimony taken under oath







Former FBI translator, who the Department of Justice’s

Inspector General and several senators have called

extremely credible (free subscription required) (Sibel

Edmonds), said “If they were to do real investigations

we would see several significant high level criminal

prosecutions in this country. And that is something

that they are not going to let out. And, believe me;

they will do everything to cover this up”. She also is

leaning towards the conclusion that 9/11 was an inside

job.



Hmmm . . . maybe 9/11 Truthers are not nuts.



Sphere: Related Content







Email this



Please note: Your comment will not appear

automatically. It must be moderated, thanks to no

shortage of trolls.





gravel kucinich paul nader on November 15th, 2007

Gravel kucinich paul nader perot carter

[conyers?rangel?] united for truth elicit fear smear

blacklist.



Honesty compassion intelligence guts.



No more extortion blackmail bribery division.



Divided we fall.



Martin Timothy on November 18th, 2007

Readers this a long but very important post, it

details evidence of treason and Israeli complicity in

the crimes of 911.



Alon Pinkas, Israel’s consul general confirmed that

three Israelis were killed in the 911 WTC attacks, two

in the planes which crashed into the towers, and one

who had been the WTC on business. UP It was via the

buddy system on Odigo software, which allows one to

communicate to a large group of people that share a

trait, such as the Hebrew language, that thousands of

Israelis were warned not to go to the twin towers on

9/11. American Securities and Exchange Commission says

Israeli citizens, sold short a list of 38 stocks that

could reasonably be expected to fall in value as a

result of the pending attacks. These speculators

operated out of the Toronto, Canada and Frankfurt,

Germany, stock exchanges and their profits were

specifically stated to be in the hundreds of millions

of dollars. Christopher Bollyn.



Felafel nuthin’… I have been trying to get the FBI to

investigate the pizza connection to 911 for years…



Scrutinize pizza delivery records for the evening of

September 11 throughout Australia’s major cities.

Short selling of stocks involves the opportunity to

gain large profits by passing shares to a friendly

third party, then buying them back when the price

falls. Historically, if this precedes a traumatic

event, it is an indication of foreknowledge. TBR Could

be Jews who knew the attacks were going to happen, sat

up late in Melbourne and Sydney, on the evening of

September 11 2001, to watch the show which began in

those cities sometime around 0002 AEST Sept 12. Maybe

it was common knowledge in some schools, picture

teenage entrepreneurs sitting up late, stuffing their

with pizza, watching their investments mature. Did a

spike occur in late night food orders in Australia

prior to the attacks on the evening of 911, if it did,

were those extra orders delivered to the homes of

Jews.



Similarly, this story can blow the lid sky high off

both the Holocaust and Mossad involvement with

international terrorism… Like the Pizza connection the

FBI don’t wanna know …Katherine Schweitzer a Hungarian

Jew from Budapest, was last seen alive 22 December

2006, she had gone public on the television program 60

Minutes during the nineties. She was the only survivor

in her family that was arrested in 1944 by a Jew

member of Horsha, the Hungarian thug police and

deported to Auschwitz, she was incensed that the Jew

who arrested her was living a few doors up on the same

street in Sydney.



Her body was found stuffed inside a wheelie bin inside

her high security apartment December 28 2006, maybe

Katherine Schweitzer was murdered by Jew elements in

reprisal for telling the truth, after her story went

on the net November 30 2006, concerned her testimony

would encourage other survivors of the so called

Holocaust to do the same. And to warn any other Jews

who want to tell the truth, just what the consequences

will be.



Maybe Fritz-Harry Cremer is a Mossad agent and perhaps

he talked his way into her apartment and murdered her.

The Talmudist Zionist lobby is looking for a way to

divert attention from Israeli complicity in 911, and

to stir up as much trouble and spread as much BS as it

can at the same time. Any suggestion that anti Jewish

prejudices fuel my operation should be dispelled… This

killing like 911 and the rest, will remain as an

agenda item until all guilty persons have been

prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.



911 The Explosive Evidence vid… The has a Serbo

Croatian mercenary at 1 hr 09 minutes… Take a look at

the video… there is a Tomahawk Class Cruise Missile

plummeting toward the WTC at 5 m 50 sec. The damage to

WTC’s 4, 5 and 6 visible on high resolution

photographs @ Killtown.com, said to be caused by the

missile’s multiple thermonuclear warheads, reveal

multiple cratering… One concrete panel inside the

devastated WTC 6 appears to be partially vaporized, a

shallow concave surface defining the event horizon of

the thermonuclear fireball…



As the second jet rammed its target …that was an

explosion, says Stephen McArdle a tax consultant from

inside the Marriot Hotel, he was taping as part of an

FBI sting operation… Then comes a longer and much

louder explosion… the second explosion was thought to

be the detonation of the missile’s warhead… Greg Smith

2002.



By Christopher Bollyn @ American Free Press… A massive

explosion devastated World Trade Center 6 the

eight-story U.S. Customs building, immediately after

United Airlines Flight 175 smashed into the South

Tower at about 9:03 am… Photo caption: The flame in

the photos of the mysterious burning object passing

through the South Tower is almost pure white, and

leaves a dark trail… Is this the burning remnant of a

DU penetrator. The flaming wreckage Bollyn says might

be a DU penetrator is not, he posted shots of wreckage

thought to be an engine and part of the landing gear

of the plane that struck the South tower, which had a

different trajectory than the alleged missile.



Jack White’s 911 Studies… Photo: a pyroclastic cloud

in an inner city environment, caption… while onlookers

were distracted by the events at skyscraper level,

moments after the second plane hit the South Tower,

WTC 6 was torn apart by a massive explosion. The

crater in the building was eight stories deep, an

immense hole blasted into the sub basements… all eight

stories missing… no wreckage… blown away… vaporized by

the thermonuclear warhead on the missile… So it did

seem.



American Free Press contacted CNN to determine exactly

when the footage was filmed… CNN’s Public Affairs

Department confirmed that the explosion shown in the

footage occurred immediately after the second plane

had crashed into the South Tower… When asked if the

footage was taken at 9:04 am, the CNN archivist said

…that’s correct. When asked if CNN could offer any

explanation about what might have caused the blast

that soared higher than the 47-story WTC 7 in the

foreground, the archivist said, …We can’t figure it

out. AFP.



BS Revealed…Torrent File 911-0856-1256 WABC-CNN

footage, reveals the pyroclastic cloud event occurred

at 10:00 am simultaneous with the collapse of the

South Tower… not at 9:03 am immediately after the

impact on the South Tower …Some 800 workers from WTC 6

were safely evacuated within 12 minutes of the first

plane hitting the North Tower at about 8:46 am,

according to a Sept. 18 Washington Post article by

Stephen Barr. The Barr piece is the only known article

published about WTC 6. However Barr failed to mention

the explosion that apparently devastated the building,

just minutes after the workers had escaped with their

lives… A spokesman for FEMA told AFP that because the

building was considered to be very dangerous, there

was no data collection from WTC 6…



The tremendous damage to WTC’s 4,5 & 6 does appear

consistent with a missile strike… a multiple warhead

Tomahawk cruiser would do it easy… Though as we have

ascertained, the pyroclastic event did not occur till

the start of the collapse of the South Tower. So where

did the 9:03 am missile hit… and what precipitated the

tremendous explosion that caused the upward

pyroclastic event, filmed at 10:00 am coming from the

vicinity of WTC’s 4, 5 & 6 …or was that fallout from

the collapse of the South Tower.



Or the missile strike was at 10:00 and the 9:03

missile tape was falsified… The explosion on McArdle’s

FBI tape recorded after the impact on the South Tower,

could have been one of the explosions in the sub

basement levels Willie Rodriguez talks about… NY1 an

internet news service from NY had excellent long shots

of the entire drama… certainly no missile was visible

simultaneous with the South Tower air strike, however

the flaming wreckage identified as part of the landing

gear, and one engine was… When the South Tower began

to disintegrate at 10:00 am the station was showing

close up chromatically aberrated images, it was not

till the collapse was well under way, that the long

shots put back onto the screen. Thus we are unable to

see if a missile struck at that time, or to time the

emergence of the explosive cloud emanating from the

vicinity of WTC’s 4, 5 & 6, which could have been a

different color and texture than the collapse

material.



The Readers Digest ran a story during the WTC

construction stating explosives would be built into

the buildings to facilitate their eventual demolition.

Update: …Here’s the scoop behind the “pre installed

explosives” thing, … Paul Laffoley worked in the early

1960’s for Emery Roth and Sons, a prominent New York

City architectural design firm. On Mike Hagen Radio

Orbit on February 21 2007, he said he helped to design

the WTC with explosive charges built into the towers,

in order to take them down neatly at any time.



Check artwork on posters supposedly produced on behalf

of alleged Islamic terror group Al Muhjiron, and The

Magnificent Nineteen praising the virtues of the

alleged nineteen 911 hijackers… as well as the artwork

on the cover of Edward Hendrie’s book Antichrist

Conspiracy… Inside the Devil’s Lair. Then take a look

at the artwork produced of behalf of Mr Boredom,

Steven Spielberg’s Star Wars trilogy, the similarities

indicate that the same studio produced the whole lot.



The President said he saw the first 911 strike on TV

in Florida, the networks never broadcast so his own

people must have provided the link… Any presidential

campaign built around 911 truth would probably get

about ninety percent of the vote… Abortion is

genocide.



“…the powerful few and the institutions they control —

the government, the corporations, the armed forces,

the major political parties, the foundation-funded

pseudo-left, the universities, the mass media,

Hollywood — have imposed near-total silence on the

issue of what really happened on September 11th, 2001.

Worse, most of them have cranked out endless

tape-loops of mind-numbing propaganda aimed at

reinforcing the official Big Lie. And yet the people

are speaking out loud and clear: 9/11 was an inside

job — an act of high treason and mass murder by our

own leaders.



The 9/11 truth revolution from below will overthrow a

good part of the American power structure.

Billionaires will have their fortunes confiscated and

spend the rest of their lives in prison. Most, perhaps

all of the current administration will be tried and,

presumably, either hanged or given some kind of

truth-for-mercy deal. Its supporters throughout the

judicial and legislative branches will be forced to

resign. The CIA and other covert-op apparatuses will

be broken into a million pieces and scattered to the

four winds, finishing the job that JFK was unable to

start. The media monopoly that enabled the 9/11

cover-up will be shattered into hundreds of fragments

as the mother of all trust-busting eras commences. The

uniformed military, and especially the Pentagon, will

be purged of neocon moles, as the venerable

institution of the firing squad is revived.” Kevin

Barrett.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...