Question:
Is it a myth that the federal reserve does not get audited?
?
2009-06-18 22:53:26 UTC
http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/flaherty/flaherty6.html

An often repeated Federal Reserve conspiracy theory is that the Fed has never been audited. “Every year Congress introduces legislation to audit the FED,” wrote Thomas Schauf, “and every year it is defeated.”7 Why? Conspiracy theorists such as Schauf, Gary Kah (1991), and Pat Robertson (1994) say the reason is that the Fed is involved in an international plot to subvert U.S. sovereignty and create a one-world government. Naturally, the Fed will not permit Congress to audit its activities, lest it discover this treasonous plan and shut it down.
How much truth is there to this claim? Has the Fed ever been audited by Congress or anyone else? The Fed controls U.S. monetary policy and can act with a great deal of independence from Congress and the executive branch. Clearly, such awesome power requires some sort of regular public oversight at the very least to insure that the Fed is doing its job efficiently and effectively, and to detect any abuses of power or fraud. This essay explores the claim that the Fed has never been audited and finds that it is completely false.

A Brief History of Federal Reserve Audits
Since its inception in 1913 the Federal Reserve System has been subjected to a variety of financial and performance audits by Congress, the executive branch, and private accounting firms, although responsibility for this task has shifted from time to time. From 1913 to 1921 the Board of Governors, then known as the Federal Reserve Board which sets monetary policy and regulates the activities of the Federal Reserve Banks, was audited annually by the U.S. Treasury Department. In 1921 Congress created the Government Accounting Office (GAO) and assigned it to audit the Board until 1933. In the Banking Act of 1933, Congress voted specifically to remove the Board from the GAO’s jurisdiction. From 1933 to 1952 audit teams from the twelve Federal Reserve Banks performed the annual examination of the BOG’s books. From 1952 to 1978, the Board, under authorization from Congress, decided to employ nationally recognize accounting firms to conduct the audits of itself to insure independent oversight. This provided an external evaluation of the adequacy and effectiveness of the examination procedures.1

In 1978 Congress passed the Federal Banking Agency Audit Act (31 USCA §714). It placed the Federal Reserve System back under the auditing authority of the GAO. The Act significantly increased the access of the GAO to the Federal Reserve Banks, the Board, and the Federal Open Market Committee (the FOMC). Since then, the GAO has conducted over 100 financial audits and performance audits of the three Federal Reserve bodies.3

Scope of GAO Audits
Some of the more important GAO performance audits of the Fed have been in the areas of bank supervision, payment systems activities, and government securities activities. In the first area, the GAO examined how well the Fed was enforcing its regulatory powers over its member banks. In 1992 it drew attention to the Fed’s sluggish compliance with regulatory reforms mandated by the Foreign Bank Supervision Act of 1991. In examining the Fed’s payment system activities, the GAO made the Fed aware of how its pricing policies for such services as check-clearing affected private suppliers of check-clearing services, and also suggested ways to speed up the process of check collections. Security markets for government debt is a crucial market, and GAO performance audits of the Fed have lead to more openness in the primary dealer system, particularly concerning the disclosure of price information. The GAO is also involved in several ongoing performance audits of the Fed such as analysis of risks and benefits of interstate banking, regulation of derivatives, and the budget of the Federal Reserve system.2

Audits By Private Accounting Firms
Financial audits of the Fed are also conducted regularly. Each Reserve Bank is audited every year by independent General Auditors who report directly to the Board of Governors. These examinations involve financial statement audits and reviews on the effectiveness of financial controls. Each Reserve Bank also has its own internal audit mechanisms. The Board contracts each year with an outside accounting firm to evaluate the audit program’s effectiveness. Price Waterhouse conducted an audit of the Board’s 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998 financial statements and filed this report in the Board’s 1996 Annual Report (nearly identical ones appear in other Annual Reports):

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Board) as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related statements of revenues and expenses for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Board’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our au
Six answers:
Steven C
2009-06-18 23:14:26 UTC
If you had some idea of which you speak I might find your argument worthwhile, but to read one blog hardly makes you an authority on the FED if you really knew what was going on with the FED you would know that what you "copy and paste" is nonsense. It has been noted by many Institutes of knowledge that if the people were to find out what the FED was up to there would be a bloody revolution tomorrow.
gray shadow
2009-06-19 06:22:13 UTC
Yes, it is a myth.



However there are some exclusions in the law that give pause:



(1) transactions for or with a foreign central bank, government of a foreign country, or nonprivate international financing organization;

(2) deliberations, decisions, or actions on monetary policy matters, including discount window operations, reserves of member banks, securities credit, interest on deposits, and open market operations;

(3) transactions made under the direction of the Federal Open Market Committee; or

(4) a part of a discussion or communication among or between members of the Board of Governors and officers and employees of the Federal Reserve System related to clauses (1)



Why were these clauses included? There is very little published why one can only speculate, and certainly nefarious motives are fair game.



The proposed HR 1207 legislation would eliminate those exclusion. So why would people be concerned?



One insight comes from GAO testimony before congress regarding a similar bill introduced in 1993. (

http://archive.gao.gov/t2pbat5/150187.pdf ) The GAO indicated the could do a better job with the exclusions removed but recommended that congress add some prohibitions of disclosure of specific parties like foreign countries. Exactly why they would recommend that makes one wonder.
anonymous
2009-06-18 23:02:14 UTC
I do not think the Fed is into Congress auditing them and they have the political backing to stop that. Why I do not believe the Fed is out to overthrow the government, I do not think they want to play on the same field as the rest of the financial institutions and the reality is they have the influence to ensure that is the case for the foreseeable future. The only way their stuff gets opened up is if some scandal hits and the media gets involved - then the politicians will act all surprised and demand that we find out what is going on with them.
anonymous
2009-06-18 23:02:00 UTC
The Federal Reserve has never been fully audited. Why would over 230 congressmen support a bill to change the way the fed is audited if it had ever been fully audited? Why would the fed feel the need to hire a lobbyist if they weren't hiding something?
anonymous
2009-06-18 22:58:26 UTC
It is not audited, it IS secretive.



It is not independent of the government either.
sparky
2009-06-19 01:18:28 UTC
This should make you feel better and sleep well at night.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXlxBeAvsB8


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...