why do people believe the 9/11 conspiracy theory?

Question

I get what everyone is saying, but why would America do this to itself? I've heard that it would be to get support into going into Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan; but we went into Vietnam when nobody supported it. I don't want any arguments, just a clean conversation of what you believe.

Answer 1

What was once conspiracy theory is now conspiracy fact. So it's time to shut down this nonsense that a few people with box cutters can shut down the greatest nation in history. Let's get to some facts: Please watch this first video linked here. It’s only one minute. You’re going to be impressed. This is a local news video of a witness named Kenny Johannemann testifying to explosions that happened in the basement of one of the WTC towers. While he is testifying you still see both of the twin towers burning behind him in the background. This was live footage and it's only ONE minute long. Go ahead and watch this here:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEuzU3LMgCA



Those explosions were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling the tower. You didn’t see this on TV. Does that prick your interest?



Now look at this. Barry Jennings was another witness that got stuck in Building Seven during 9/11. Building Seven fell later that same day but was NEVER hit by a jet. Watch his account here:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbbZE7c3a8Q



Again, the explosions he talked about were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling down this building. Again, you didn't see Barry’s testimony on TV.



Here’s some different evidence. Steve Jones, a nuclear physicist, obtained WTC dust samples from the collapsed WTC towers and analyzed it. He reported his detailed findings here in Boston:



http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1957490867030316250&ei=JspdSaLNBZa4qAObztThDw&q=steve+jones+boston



Those “red chips” he talked about weren’t the smoking gun they were THE GUN. See the article here:



http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Scientists_find_active_superthermite_in_WTC_0404.html



Click here for his actual peer-reviewed paper::



http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM



Now get a load of this:



The BBC reported the collapse of the Solomon Building (Building Seven) 20 minutes BEFORE it actually collapsed. Watch that here:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlL6ewlW6oc



How did the BBC know in advance that Building Seven would collapse? The fact that it was announced in advance is strong support that the flow of information on this tragedy was being controlled.



Were the people at the BBC the only people privy to this information? Probably not. Larry Silverstein was the leaseholder of Building Seven. In a 2002 PBS documentary he talked about how he discussed the Building Seven situation with the fire department and how the decision was made by that department to "pull" it. Well, there is one problem with his testimony that you may want to consider. It takes about a week to rig a building with explosives before you pull it. So are buildings constructed with built-in explosives just in case they need to be blown up in a hurry? Building Seven went down that same day. Whoops! Watch Larry's testimony from the PBS documentary here in this short clip:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3E-26oVIIs



Incidentally, luckily for Larry, he insured his property in the nick of time just six months before September 11th! It was a sweet deal. So who orchestrated this terrorist event anyway? They had to get past the FBI and CIA and prepare at least three buildings for demolition as well as direct the activities of men with box cutters (if they even existed). It’s clear from the evidence presented here so far that at least some of the media was in on this. What else could explain the BBC blunder? They had to control the information to those of us who might not like the idea that a few thousand people had to be killed in order to fulfill some kind of agenda. What’s in it for these people that were “in the know?”



Aaron Russo was a famous movie producer who became best friends with one of the Rockefeller family members (Remember “The Rose” and "Trading Places" starring Eddie Murphy?). This is the same Rockefeller family that is a large shareholder of the Federal Reserve Bank -- a private company that loans money to our government and contributes to our huge national debt. You see the name “Federal Reserve” at the top the dollar bill. Yes, we're talking about THAT Bank! Anyway, the upshot of this friendship was that in the year 2000 (11 months before 9/11) Aaron Russo learned from his Rockefeller buddy that there was going to be an "event". He was told that out of this event the U.S. would go into Afghanistan and look for Bin Laden in Caves and then the U.S. would go into Iraq. His fascinating testimony about this "event" starts at 26:45 here in this interview:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGAaPjqdbgQ



Now see this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw

Answer 2

Personnaly i loved the loosechange conspiracy concept. irrespective of how unsuitable or correct it can be... the reality of the problem is, humans revel in whatever to speak or gossip approximately. Why no longer? definite rumours are being unfold always approximately more than a few matters. it provides a bit of of 'spice' to our lives. all of us have matters to disagree or consider humans approximately in existence. i realize it bought me speakme to my peers approximately it, and just about had me believing, however on the finish of the day, its just a hearsay and with rumours humans both feel them or they do not irrespective of the subject. the fundamental factor is, it will get the brain operating, and that i revel in that! so, its simply a kind of matters...

Answer 3

9/11, is definitely a conspiracy that went beyond a theory that eventually became realized. It is hardly questionable that some of the better connected players in the attack of that day came out of Ohio.



While we cannot disregard the need for a formalized 9/11 review; it is important to also look ahead to prevent another cataclysmic attack on our country.



With just a little bit of planning and effective investigation, we can prevent the next anticipated attack on the USA and our people. The necessary crisis needs to be quite devastating to push the USA's social planning into the next step of the agenda since there has been entirely too much unexpected patriotic Resistance following 9/11.



Those who are responsible for the next wave may have already planned for this circumstance in past years.While I do not lean toward planted explosives in the Twin Towers, the idea of past year planning and planting of such types of devices becomes the next concern. What if the planning for an attack on the USA was completed years ago, and simply awaits detonation? It could be sort of like an Orson Wells novel, War of the Worlds where the aliens are underground for centuries before rising up--but such a successful human tragedy would not require such extravagant machinery from another planet, no less.



Perhaps in past years, during a building boom, there were seedy groups planting long life explosives in buildings, under ground, or neatly nestled in cement fixtures that we pass by daily. Those that became aware of the plans are some of those who were arrested for felonies for taking out the deceptors for taking advantage of a legitimate building contract, but never gave the information to the rightful authorities for fear of being labeled insane. With enough effective propaganda, no one would believe it and write it off as fiction, no less.



Perhaps during the more radical years, 70's, 50's, 60's, some of the more violently competing groups were trying to prevent a great tragedy from taking place sometime in the future, but their notes and intelligence were stolen and passed on to other more connected groups and there has been an entire underground world involved in preventing the accumulation of these facts to prevent these bombs from being set off by a different group. This problem would easily have been remedied by a more effectual legal system, but we all know how that goes--smaller problems are overlooked in lieu of job security and the excitement of a more challenging case. We do need to look ahead, just as importantly as we look behind what has transpired already. The USA government is responsible for taking a complaint, sorting through the facts available and saving the information to be used as is necessary at a later time. I cannot help but believe there is some indication neatly filed somewhere that can help prevent the next successful attack on this USA and our people.



We really do need to make sure the agencies are funded adequately enough to take all matter seriously, and intervene as necessary.

Answer 4

Conspiracy belief is a cult and like any religion it holds a certain power over the believer. For the person who believes the U.S. government did 9/11 this is secret, special knowledge unknown or ignored by the masses of brainwashed sheeple. This gives the believer a sense of power, moral and intellectual superiority and purpose in their otherwise pathetic and useless life. They are the chosen ones and you are not. That means they are better than you.



This is a tough obstacle to overcome no matter how good your evidence and arguments.

Answer 5

People didn't like the US government at the time of 9/11. If the government was indeed responsible, it's not a secret they can easily keep.

Answer 6

Gulf of Tonkin 1964

Answer 7

And all of these people lied?



4/21/04 CNN: Senator Hillary Clinton said, "No, I don't regret giving the president authority because at the time it was in the context of weapons of mass destruction, grave threats to the United States, and clearly, Saddam Hussein had been a real problem for the international community for more than a decade."



-10/10/02 Sen. Hillary Clinton (now Secretary of State) on the Senate floor: “In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members.”



-Hans Blix, Chief UN Weapons Inspector addressing the UN Security Council, 1/27/03: “13,000 chemical bombs were dropped by the Iraqi Air Force between 1983 and 1988, while Iraq has declared that 19,500 bombs were consumed during this period. Thus, there is a discrepancy of 6,500 bombs. The amount of chemical agent in these bombs would be in the order of about 1,000 tons.”



-9/29/02 Al Gore: “Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power. We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country. The nerve agent VX is one of the most toxic ever developed.”



-2/13/03 Presidential candidate John Kerry: If you don’t believe Saddam Hussein is a threat with nuclear weapons, then you shouldn’t vote for me.”



-7/22/03 CNN, Former President Clinton said: “People can argue whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons.”



7/31/12 Associated Press, Baghdad: Britain will help the Iraqi government dispose of what's left of deposed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein's chemical weapons, still stored in two bunkers in north of Baghdad, the British embassy in Baghdad announced Monday.

Answer 8

Because the Government of the U.S.A. had at least knowledge before the attack. and that's at the Very least. Idiots.

Answer 9

Challenge for anybody who still thinks that 19 suicidal fanatics did it.



Will you please, provide PROF that there was ever any aircraft crashed

into either of the twin towers that day. EVIDENCE PLEASE.

Answer 10

Because you'd have to be bat **** crazy to believe the official story.